ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2019
Intrapartum PCR-assay for detection of Group B Streptococci (GBS).
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing and dosage of intrapartum prophylactic penicillin for preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease: assessing maternal and umbilical cord blood concentration.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025Article
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes of Group B Streptococcus colonization: a retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Development and performance evaluation of a qPCR-based assay for the fully automated detection of group BMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Performance of BD MAX Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Assay without Enrichment for the Detection of GBS.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Group B streptococcal disease in the mother and newborn-A review.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2020Article
- The effect of group B streptococcus on maternal and infants' prognosis in Guizhou, China.Bioscience reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe have recently introduced intrapartum PCR-testing for group B streptococcus (GBS) in women in labor with prolonged rupture of membranes or preterm delivery to offer intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis only for GBS positive women.The goal of the present study is to report our experience and results from the first half year of GBS testing. STUDY
designThis is a retrospective study. Rectovaginal swabs from 321 women presenting in the labor ward with pre-labor rupture of membranes for >14 h/rupture of membranes during delivery for >14 h, or labor between gestational weeks 35 0/7 and 36 6/7 from February 7, 2017 to August 6, 2017, were tested.We performed a molecular GBS test (Xpert GBS®, Cepheid Ltd., Sunnyvale, USA).Data from patient files including mode of delivery, use of antibiotics, infection of mother and child are presented in more detail.Data on the PCR results from the first year of testing were also collected.
resultsIn the first half-year of testing a positive GBS test result was found in 58 (18.1%) and a negative test result in 263 women (81.9%). No invalid test result was achieved.The indication for performing PCR testing was PROM > 14 h or rupture of membranes during labor for >14 h in 266 women (82.9%) and labor in gestational weeks 35 0/7-36 6/7 in 44 women (13.7%). In the remaining 11 women, the PCR test was performed for other reasons.Of the 321 women tested 126 (39%) received antibiotics during labor.Ten women (3.4%) were treated after delivery on suspicion of infection. 25 newborns (7.8%) were treated with antibiotics. In 11 cases, the treatment was stopped after 2-4 days as there were no signs of infection.
conclusionsThe introduction of the intrapartum GBS test in selected groups of women who gave birth in our department has been well accepted by the women, the midwifes and doctors. The result of the test is available within two hours, and as we only offer intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-positive women, we have reduced the use of antibiotics to approximately 40% in the groups tested, without an increase of infection in mother or child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.