Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673659›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Krishan R Jethwa, Christopher D Hellekson, Jaden D Evans, William S Harmsen, Tyler J Wilhite, Thomas J Whitaker, Sean S Park, C Richard Choo, Bradley J Stish, Kenneth R Olivier and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishan R JethwaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Christopher D HelleksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jaden D EvansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
William S HarmsenBiomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, Minnesota.
Tyler J WilhiteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Thomas J WhitakerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sean S ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
C Richard ChooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bradley J StishDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kenneth R OlivierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rimki HaloiDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Val J LoweDepartment of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota.
Brian T WelchDepartment of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Fernando QuevedoDepartment of Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Lance A MynderseDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Eugene D KwonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Brian J DavisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Rochester · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

A Phase II Evaluation of SABR in Oligometastatic Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer and Immunogenicity of SABRR01CA200551 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DONG, HAIDONG, PARK, SEAN S · 2016 to 2018
$739k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) adverse events (AEs) of METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2013 to 2016, 107 patients experienced biochemical failure of prostate cancer, had CholPET-detected pelvic and/or paraortic LN recurrence, and were referred for RT. Patients received androgen suppression and CholPET guided LN RT (median dose, 45 Gy) with a simultaneous integrated boost to CholPET-avid sites (median dose, 56.25 Gy), all in 25 fractions. RT-naïve patients had the prostatic fossa included in the initial treatment volumes followed by a sequential boost (median dose, 68 Gy). GI and GU AEs were reported per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) with data gathered retrospectively. Differences in maximum GI and GU AEs at baseline, immediately post-RT, and at early (median, 4 months) and late (median, 14 months) follow-up were assessed.

resultsMedian follow-up was 16 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11-25). Median prostate-specific antigen at time of positive CholPET was 2.3 ng/mL (IQR, 1.3-4.8), with a median of 2 (IQR, 1-4) choline-avid LNs per patient. Most recurrences were within the pelvis (53%) or pelvis + paraortic (40%). Baseline rates of grade 1 to 2 GI AEs were 8.4% compared with 51.9% (4.7% grade 2) of patients post-RT (

conclusionsSalvage CholPET guided nodal RT has acceptably low rates of acute GI and GU AEs and no significant detriment in 14-month GI AEs. These data are of value in counseling patients and designing prospective trials evaluating the oncologic efficacy of this treatment strategy.

Identifiers

PMID31673659
PMCPMC6817538
OpenAlexW2955235183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.