Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673656›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Lara Hathout, Omar Mahmoud, Yaqun Wang, Irina Vergalasova, Maroie Barkati, Philippe Després, André-Guy Martin, William Foster, Frédéric Lacroix, Guila Delouya and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lara HathoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Omar MahmoudDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Yaqun WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Irina VergalasovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Maroie BarkatiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Philippe DesprésDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
André-Guy MartinDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
William FosterDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Frédéric LacroixDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Guila DelouyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Daniel TausskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Gerard MortonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eric VigneaultDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB to 144 Gy or single-fraction Iridium-192 HDRB to 19 Gy. HRQOL and urinary toxicity were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scoring and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Independent samples

resultsLDRB and HDRB were performed in 15 and 16 patients, respectively, for a total of 31 patients. At 3 months, patients treated with LDRB had a higher IPSS score (mean, 15.5 vs 6.0, respectively;

conclusionsHDRB monotherapy is a promising modality associated with a lower urinary toxicity profile and higher HRQOL in the first 12 months compared with LDRB.

Identifiers

PMID31673656
PMCPMC6817536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.