ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2019
Patient-reported outcome measures in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 1-year prospective study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcomes, patient mental health and caregiver burden.Acta ophthalmologica · 2023Pooled it
- Simulating Macular Degeneration to Investigate Activities of Daily Living: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- EQ-5D vision bolt-on in macular degeneration: associations with visual measures and effect on utility differences and cost-effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Trial
- Discordance Between Eye-Specific Clinical Outcomes and Patient-Reported Visual Function After Faricimab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Two-Case Report.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of a structured patient engagement program on treatment adherence, injection persistence, and visual outcomes in real-world anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Nanomaterial-enabled delivery of plant-derived bioactive metabolites for diabetic retinopathy: from evidence appraisal to preclinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- To Treat or Not to Treat? Resolving the Question of Subretinal and Intraretinal Fluid in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Review
- Faricimab versus bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Cost analysis based on real-world data from the Swedish Macula Registry.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses.PloS one · 2025Article
- The I-OPTA Questionnaire: A National Assessment of Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a prospective cohort study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- The remarkably frequent use of EQ-5D in non-economic research.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Drop in well-being of ARMD patients under treatment with anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 pandemic.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The effects of loading ranibizumab on vision-related quality of life in the treatment of low-risk neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo prospectively explore the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD): (1) self-reported visual function, (2) symptom-state, (3) general-health and (4) satisfaction of treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Corresponding to the four PROMs, participants responded to the following questionnaires: (1) National Eye Institute Visual-Functioning-Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), (2) Patient-Acceptable-Symptom-Status (PASS 5), (3) EuroQol-Group-Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and (4) Dimensions of Importance in Treatment of nAMD (DITAMD). Data were collected at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Results were evaluated with t-tests and mixed linear regression analyses.
resultsThe study included 197 patients. At baseline NEI-VFQ-25 (79.53±14.52) and EQ-5D (0.74±0.28) had relatively high scores, whereas PASS 5 was below 'acceptable' (3.30±0.80). At 12 months NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5 showed significant improvement, whereas EQ-5D and DITAMD remained unchanged. At baseline patients receiving treatment of the better-seeing eye (BSE) (n=52) reported significantly worse NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5 than patients for whom treatment only involved the worse-seeing eye (WSE), (n=145). In contrast to BSE patients, there was no improvement of NEI-VFQ-25 for WSE patients at 12 months, despite a significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Two independent variables, treatment including the BSE and BCVA for the treated eye, were found to predict both NEI-VFQ-25 and PASS 5.
conclusionAfter 12 months of nAMD treatment, there was a significant improvement in PASS 5 and NEI-VFQ-25, the latter depending on whether therapy included BSE. EQ-5D and DITAMD remained unaltered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.