ArticleStructural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)2019
FACT and FAIR with Big Data allows objectivity in science: The view of crystallography.
Article in Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing PTSD-Substance Use Comorbidity Treatment Research Through Applying FAIR and FACT Data Science Frameworks inJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2026Article
- Powder diffraction data beyond the pattern: a practical review.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Review
- Benchmarking deep learning for automated peak detection on GIWAXS data.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
- Article
- 2023 update of template tables for reporting biomolecular structural modelling of small-angle scattering data.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- Raw diffraction data are our ground truth from which all subsequent workflows develop.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Submission of structural biology data for review purposes.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Submission of structural biology data for review purposes.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2021Article
- UnityMol prototype for FAIR sharing of molecular-visualization experiences: from pictures in the cloud to collaborative virtual reality exploration in immersive 3D environments.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Validation of the Crystallography Open Database using the Crystallographic Information Framework.Journal of applied crystallography · 2021Article
- Article
- Transactions from the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Crystallographic Association: Data best practices-current state and future needs.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A publication is an important narrative of the work done and interpretations made by researchers securing a scientific discovery. As The Royal Society neatly states though, "Nullius in verba" ("Take nobody's word for it"), whereby the role of the underpinning data is paramount. Therefore, the objectivity that preserving that data within the article provides is due to readers being able to check the calculation decisions of the authors. But how to achieve full data archiving? This is the raw data archiving challenge, in size and need for correct metadata. Processed diffraction data and final derived molecular coordinates archiving in crystallography have achieved an exemplary state of the art relative to most fields. One can credit IUCr with developing exemplary peer review procedures, of narrative, underpinning structure factors and coordinate data and validation report, through its checkcif development and submission system introduced for Acta Cryst. C and subsequently developed for its other chemistry journals. The crystallographic databases likewise have achieved amazing success and sustainability these last 50 years or so. The wider science data scene is celebrating the FAIR data accord, namely, that data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable [Wilkinson
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.