Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673567›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019

Deep learning-based image quality improvement for low-dose computed tomography simulation in radiation therapy.

Tonghe Wang, Yang Lei, Zhen Tian, Xue Dong, Yingzi Liu, Xiaojun Jiang, Walter J Curran, Tian Liu, Hui-Kuo Shu, Xiaofeng Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Deep learning in medical image registration: a review.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  14. Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tonghe WangEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Yang LeiEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Zhen TianEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Xue DongEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Yingzi LiuEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Xiaojun JiangEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Walter J CurranEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Tian LiuEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Hui-Kuo ShuEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Xiaofeng YangEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9023-5855
Winship Cancer InstituteEmory University · US

Funding

Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) is desirable for treatment planning and simulation in radiation therapy. Multiple rescanning and replanning during the treatment course with a smaller amount of dose than a single conventional full-dose CT simulation is a crucial step in adaptive radiation therapy. We developed a machine learning-based method to improve image quality of low-dose CT for radiation therapy treatment simulation. We used a residual block concept and a self-attention strategy with a cycle-consistent adversarial network framework. A fully convolution neural network with residual blocks and attention gates (AGs) was used in the generator to enable end-to-end transformation. We have collected CT images from 30 patients treated with frameless brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for this study. These full-dose images were used to generate projection data, which were then added with noise to simulate the low-mAs scanning scenario. Low-dose CT images were reconstructed from this noise-contaminated projection data and were fed into our network along with the original full-dose CT images for training. The performance of our network was evaluated by quantitatively comparing the high-quality CT images generated by our method with the original full-dose images. When mAs is reduced to 0.5% of the original CT scan, the mean square error of the CT images obtained by our method is

Indexed as

computed tomographylow dosemachine learningradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID31673567
PMCPMC6811730
OpenAlexW2981811371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.