Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673474›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019

The predictive value of weight gain and waist circumference for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Taha Takmaz, Ethem Serdar Yalvaç, Pınar Özcan, Ulaş Çoban, Ayşe Filiz Gökmen Karasu, Mehmet Ünsal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Taha TakmazBezmialem University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-2348
Ethem Serdar YalvaçBozok University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yozgat, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-4999
Pınar ÖzcanBezmialem University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0306-6422
Ulaş Çobanİstanbul Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9760-7404
Ayşe Filiz Gökmen KarasuBezmialem University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-4691
Mehmet ÜnsalUniversitiy of Health Sciences, Elik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-6804
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TRŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRYozgat Bozok Üniversitesi · TRZübeyde Hanim Maternity Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe first objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and gestational weight gain (WG), waist circumference (WC), prepregnancy, and gestational body mass index (BMI). The second aim of our study was to assess the ability of WG, WC, prepregnancy, and gestational BMI with special reference to their cut-off points on predicting the risk of GDM in pregnant women in Turkey. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 261 women who underwent screening for GDM with the 75-g glucose tolerance test (GTT) between 24

resultsWC at 20-24 weeks of gestation, prepregnancy BMI, and gestational BMI had a predictive capacity for GDM. According to our results, optimal cut-off points for the best predictive value of GDM were WC of 100 cm with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 70%, prepregnancy BMI of 25 kg/m

conclusionThe measurement of prepregnancy BMI, gestational BMI, and WC may be useful in predicting the risk of GDM. Pregnant women with increased prepregnancy BMI, gestational BMI, and WC measurements may be susceptible to the development of GDM.

Indexed as

body mass indexGestational diabetes mellituspregnancywaist circumferenceweight gain

Identifiers

PMID31673474
PMCPMC6792050
OpenAlexW2980064363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.