Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673386›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Coronary risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure.

Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch, Mia Pries-Heje, Thomas Engstrøm, Andreas Sandø, Merete Heitmann, Frants Pedersen, Morten Schou, Hans Mickley, Hanne Elming, Rolf Steffensen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rasmus Bo HasselbalchDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-6268
Mia Pries-HejeDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Thomas EngstrømDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas SandøDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Merete HeitmannDepartment of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frants PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten SchouDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Hans MickleyDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Hanne ElmingDepartment of Cardiology, Roskilde Sygehus, Roskilde, Denmark.
Rolf SteffensenDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Lars KoeberDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper Karmark IversenDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev og Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF). Multislice CT (MSCT) is a non-invasive alternative to coronary angiography (CAG) suggested for patients with a low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. No established definition of such patients exists. Our purpose was to develop a simple score to identify as large a group as possible with a suitable pretest risk of CAD. Methods: Retrospective study of patients in Denmark undergoing CAG due to newly diagnosed HF from 2010 to 2014. All Danish patients were registered in two databases according to geographical location. We used data from one registry and multiple logistic regression with backwards elimination to find predictors of CAD and used the derived OR to develop a clinical risk score called the CT-HF score, which was subsequently validated in the other database. Results: The main cohort consisted of 2171 patients and the validation cohort consisted of 2795 patients with 24% and 27% of patients having significant CAD, respectively. Among significant predictor, the strongest was extracardiac arteriopathy (OR 2.84). Other significant factors were male sex, smoking, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, angina and age. A proposed cut-off of 9 points identified 61% of patients with a 15% risk of having CAD, resulting in an estimated savings of 15% of the cost and 21% of the radiation. Conclusions: A simple score based on clinical risk factors could identify HF patients with a low risk of CAD; these patients may have benefitted from MSCT as a gatekeeper for CAG.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseheartfailure

Identifiers

PMID31673386
PMCPMC6802977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.