Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673335›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2019

Atypical forms of diabetes mellitus in Africans and other non-European ethnic populations in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

Charlotte Bavuma, Diomira Sahabandu, Sanctus Musafiri, Ina Danquah, Ruth McQuillan, Sarah Wild

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An atypical presentation of type 1 diabetes.Archive of clinical cases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Charlotte BavumaUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda.
Diomira SahabanduInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Sanctus MusafiriUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda.
Ina DanquahInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Ruth McQuillanUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah WildUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInstitute for Social Anthropology · ATUniversity of Kigali · RWUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtypical presentations of diabetes mellitus (DM) have been reported in non-European ethnic populations under various names. It is unclear whether those names are used for the same or different clinical phenotypes. Unclear terminology may lead to inappropriate treatment and an underestimation of the burden caused by atypical diabetes phenotypes overlapping with classic types of diabetes. This review aimed to describe the terms used for atypical forms of diabetes and to investigate whether the terms are used for similar or different phenotypes.

methodsPubMed and Scopus were searched for relevant publications in French or English available before 15 September 2015 using the terms: "Atypical diabetes", "Malnutrition Related Diabetes Mellitus (MRDM)", "Fibro-calculus pancreatic diabetes (FCPD)", Protein deficient Pancreatic Diabetes (PDPD)", "African diabetes", "Ketosis prone-type 2 diabetes", "tropical diabetes", "Flatbush diabetes", "J-type diabetes". Titles, abstracts screening and quality assessment were performed by two independent authors. Observational studies addressing atypical diabetes in humans aged 14 years and above were included. One author extracted data from selected articles.

results22 articles among 350 identified articles were retained for data extraction. Two atypical diabetes phenotypes were identified, each of them with a variety of names but similar definitions. One phenotype occurred in very thin people less than 30 years of age, typically from poor socio-economic backgrounds and requires insulin for life. It differs from type 1 diabetes in the tolerance of high blood glucose without ketosis in the absence of exogenous insulin. The second phenotype resembles type1 diabetes as it presents with ketosis at onset but responds well, as type2 diabetes, to oral hypoglycemic drugs after initial stabilization with insulin. It occurs in individuals who are usually over 30 years of age, with normal or overweight and absence of auto antibodies mainly found in type 1 diabetes.

conclusionThe scarce existing literature used various terms for similar diabetes phenotypes. Agreement on nomenclature for the various forms of diabetes using the above reported characteristics are needed in populations where atypical forms of diabetes exist as well as better characterization of phenotypes and genotypes to inform evidence based treatment.

Indexed as

Black PeopleEthnicityDeveloping CountriesDiabetes MellitusHumansPhenotypeTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31673335
PMCPMC6818125
OpenAlexW2962857564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.