Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673329›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2019

Preclinical development of HQP1351, a multikinase inhibitor targeting a broad spectrum of mutant KIT kinases, for the treatment of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Xuechao Liu, Guangfeng Wang, Xianglei Yan, Haibo Qiu, Ping Min, Miaoyi Wu, Chunyang Tang, Fei Zhang, Qiuqiong Tang, Saijie Zhu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xuechao Liu *1Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.
Guangfeng Wang *Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Xianglei Yan *3Department of Experimental Research, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.
Haibo Qiu1Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.
Ping MinAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Miaoyi WuAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Chunyang TangAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Fei ZhangAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Qiuqiong TangAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Saijie ZhuAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Miaozhen Qiu4Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.
Wei Zhuang3Department of Experimental Research, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.
Douglas D FangAscentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei Zhou *1Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1338-1220
Dajun Yang *Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215100 People's Republic of China.
Yifan Zhai *HealthQuest Pharma Inc., Room 314, Building F, 3 Lanyue Road, Science City, Huangpu, Guangzhou, 510663 People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImatinib shows limited efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) carrying secondary KIT mutations. HQP1351, an orally bioavailable multikinase BCR-ABL inhibitor, is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of T315I mutant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), but the potential application in imatinib-resistant GISTs carrying secondary KIT mutations has not been explored.

methodsThe binding activities of HQP1351 with native or mutant KIT were first analyzed. Imatinib-sensitive GIST T1 and imatinib-resistant GIST 430 cells were employed to test the in vitro antiproliferative activity. Colony formation assay, cell migration assay and cell invasion assay were performed to evaluate the clonogenic, migration and invasion ability respectively. Flow cytometry and western blot analysis were used to detect cell apoptosis, cell cycle and signaling pathway. In vivo antitumor activity was evaluated in mouse xenograft models derived from GIST cell lines.

resultsHQP1351 potently inhibited both wild-type and mutant KIT kinases. In both imatinib-resistant and sensitive GIST cell lines, HQP1351 exhibited more potent or equivalent antiproliferative activity compared with ponatinib, a third generation BCR-ABL and KIT inhibitor. HQP1351 led to more profound inhibition of cell colony formation, cell migration and invasion, cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis than ponatinib. Furthermore, HQP1351 also inhibited p-KIT, p-AKT, p-ERK1/2, and p-STAT3 to a higher extent than ponatinib. Finally, in xenograft tumor models derived from imatinib-resistant GIST cancer cell lines, HQP1351 exhibited antitumor activity superior to ponatinib.

conclusionsCollectively, our in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the therapeutic application of HQP1351 in imatinib-resistant GIST patients deserves further investigation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Drug resistanceGastrointestinal stromal tumorImatinibKit tyrosine kinase

Identifiers

PMID31673329
PMCPMC6815454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.