Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673299›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2019

Lazy Sundays: role of day of the week and reactivity on objectively measured physical activity in older people.

Jochen Klenk, Raphael Simon Peter, Kilian Rapp, Dhayana Dallmeier, Dietrich Rothenbacher, Michael Denkinger, Gisela Büchele, ActiFE Study Group, T Becker, B Böhm and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Real-world walking and activity patterns in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the SMART-AGE trial.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Not just how much, but how it's done: movement activity bout distributions and everyday cognition in older adults with elevated dementia risk.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Patterns of physical activity among nursing home residents before and during the Covid 19 pandemic-a systematic observation.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of activPAL to Measure Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Correction to: Lazy Sundays: role of day of the week and reactivity on objectively measured physical activity in older people.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jochen Klenk1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Raphael Simon Peter1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Kilian Rapp2Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbachstr 110, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.
Dhayana DallmeierBethesda Geriatric Clinic, Zollernring 26, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Dietrich Rothenbacher1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Michael DenkingerBethesda Geriatric Clinic, Zollernring 26, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Gisela Büchele1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
ActiFE Study Group
T Becker1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
B Böhm1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
K Scharffetter-Kochanek1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
J Stingl1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
W Koenig1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
M Riepe1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
R Peter1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
H Geiger1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
A Ludolph1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
C von Arnim1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
G Nagel1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
G Weinmayr1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
J M Steinacker1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
R Laszlo1Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Helmholtz-Institute Ulm · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DERobert Bosch Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of day of the week and wearing a device (reactivity) on objectively measured physical activity (PA) in older people.

methodsWalking duration as a measure for PA was recorded from 1333 German community-dwelling older people (≥65 years, 43.8% women) over 5 days using accelerometers (activPAL). Least-square means of PA with 95%-confidence intervals (95%-CI) from multi-level analysis were calculated for each day of the week and each measurement day (days after sensor attachment).

resultsWalking duration on Sundays was significantly lower compared to working days (Sunday vs. Monday-Friday: - 12.8 min (95%-CI: - 14.7; - 10.9)). No statistically significant difference compared to working days was present for Saturdays. The linear slope for measurement day and walking duration was marginal and not statistically significant.

conclusionsStudies using PA sensors in older people should assess Sundays and working days to adequately determine the activity level of the participants.

Indexed as

MeasurementOlder peoplePhysical activityReactivityResearch methods

Identifiers

PMID31673299
PMCPMC6815398
OpenAlexW2982069510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.