Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673194›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2019

Task sharing for family planning services, Burkina Faso.

Tieba Millogo, Séni Kouanda, Nguyen Toan Tran, Boezemwendé Kaboré, Namoudou Keita, Leopold Ouedraogo, Fatim Tall, James Kiarie, Nandita Thatte, Mario Festin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Women's Attitudes toward Family Planning in the Postpartum Period and Affecting Factors: Turkiye Sample.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tieba MillogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Séni KouandaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Nguyen Toan TranAustralian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Boezemwendé KaboréFamily Planning Service, Health Ministry, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Namoudou KeitaWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Leopold OuedraogoWHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Fatim TallReproductive and Women's Health, Intercountry support team World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
James KiarieDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Nandita ThatteDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Mario FestinDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Asa Cuzin-KihlDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemIn Burkina Faso, the coverage of services for family planning is low due to shortage of qualified health staff and limited access to services. APPROACH: Following the launch of the Ouagadougou Partnership, an alliance to catalyse the expansion of family planning services, the health ministry created a consortium of family planning stakeholders in 2011. The consortium adopted a collaborative framework to implement a pilot project for task sharing in family planning at community and primary health-care centre levels in two rural districts. Stakeholders were responsible for their areas of expertise. These areas included advocacy; monitoring and evaluation; and capacity development of community health workers (CHWs) to offer oral and injectable contraceptives to new users and of auxiliary nurses and auxiliary midwives to provide implants and intrauterine devices. The health ministry implemented supportive supervision cascades involving relevant planning and service levels. LOCAL

settingIn Burkina Faso, only 15% (2563/17 087) of married women used modern contraceptives in 2010. RELEVANT CHANGES: Adoption of new policies and clinical care standards expanded task sharing roles in family planning. The consortium trained a total of 79 CHWs and 124 auxiliary nurses and midwives. Between January 2017 and December 2018, CHWs provided injectables to 3698 new users, and auxiliary nurses or midwives provided 726 intrauterine devices and 2574 implants to new users. No safety issues were reported. LESSONS LEARNT: The pilot project was feasible and safe, however, financial constraints are hindering scale-up efforts. Supportive supervision cascades were critical in ensuring success.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesInterinstitutional RelationsBurkina FasoContraception BehaviorFemaleHealth PolicyHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31673194
PMCPMC6802696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.