Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673164›Full record

ArticleAutomatica : the journal of IFAC, the International Federation of Automatic Control2019

Pharmaceutical-based entrainment of circadian phase via nonlinear model predictive control.

John H Abel, Ankush Chakrabarty, Elizabeth B Klerman, Francis J Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Automatica : the journal of IFAC, the International Federation of Automatic Control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DyNeuMo Mk-2: An Investigational Circadian-Locked Neuromodulator with Responsive Stimulation for Applied Chronobiology.Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John H AbelDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ankush ChakrabartyHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Elizabeth B KlermanDivision of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Francis J DoyleDivision of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

TRAINING IN SLEEP, CIRCADIAN &RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGYT32HL007901 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Charles A Czeisler · 1998 to 2026
$18.5M
Sleep Duration Required to Restore Performance during Chronic Sleep RestrictionK24HL105664 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2010 to 2019
$1.8M
MECHANISMS AND MODELING OF NETWORKED CIRCADIAN PACEMAKER SYNCHRONIZATIONR01GM096873 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DOYLE, FRANCIS J, HENSON, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105664NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007901NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of closed-loop control in systems biology has resulted from improvements in sensors, computing, actuation, and the discovery of alternative sites of targeted drug delivery. Most control algorithms for circadian phase resetting exploit light inputs. However, recently identified small-molecule pharmaceuticals offer advantages in terms of invasiveness and potency of actuation. Herein, we develop a systematic method to control the phase of biological oscillations motivated by the recently identified small molecule circadian pharmaceutical KL001. The model-based control architecture exploits an infinitesimal parametric phase response curve (ipPRC) that is used to predict the effect of control inputs on future phase trajectories of the oscillator. The continuous time optimal control policy is first derived for phase resetting, based on the ipPRC and Pontryagin's maximum principle. Owing to practical challenges in implementing a continuous time optimal control policy, we investigate the effect of implementing the continuous time policy in a sampled time format. Specifically, we provide bounds on the errors incurred by the physiologically tractable sampled time control law. We use these results to select directions of resetting (i.e. phase advance or delay), sampling intervals, and prediction horizons for a nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) algorithm for phase resetting. The potential of this ipPRC-informed pharmaceutical nonlinear MPC is then demonstrated

Indexed as

circadian oscillatorsentrainmentmodel predictive controlnonlinear dynamicsoptimal controlphasePhase response curvesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31673164
PMCPMC6822617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.