Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Improved 18S and 28S rDNA primer sets for NGS-based parasite detection.

Asuka Kounosu, Kazunori Murase, Akemi Yoshida, Haruhiko Maruyama, Taisei Kikuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asuka KounosuDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Kazunori MuraseDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Akemi YoshidaDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Haruhiko MaruyamaDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Taisei KikuchiDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan. taisei_kikuchi@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-9167
University of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled comprehensive analyses of the microbial community through extensive parallel sequencing. Current analyses of the eukaryotic microbial community are primarily based on polymerase chain reaction amplification of 18S rRNA gene (rDNA) fragments. We found that widely-used 18S rDNA primers can amplify numerous stretches of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, preventing the high-throughput detection of rare eukaryotic species, particularly in bacteria-rich samples such as faecal material. In this study, we employed in silico and NGS-based analyses of faecal samples to evaluated the existing primers targeting eukaryotic 18S and 28S rDNA in terms of avoiding bacterial read contamination and improving taxonomic coverage for eukaryotes, with a particular emphasis on parasite taxa. Our findings revealed that newly selected primer sets could achieve these objectives, representing an alternative strategy for NGS.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersEukaryotaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingParasitesPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID31673037
PMCPMC6823512
OpenAlexW2982613190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.