ArticleScientific reports2019
Firing activities of a fractional-order FitzHugh-Rinzel bursting neuron model and its coupled dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parameter estimation of the network of FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons based on the speed-gradient and filtering.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamics and synchronization control of fractional conformable neuron system.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Non-Trivial Dynamics in the FizHugh-Rinzel Model and Non-Homogeneous Oscillatory-Excitable Reaction-Diffusions Systems.Biology · 2023Article
- Diverse electrical responses in a network of fractional-order conductance-based excitable Morris-Lecar systems.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Fractional-Order Traveling Wave Approximations for a Fractional-Order Neural Field Model.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Emergence of bursting in a network of memory dependent excitable and spiking leech-heart neurons.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractional-order dynamics of excitable systems can be physically described as a memory dependent phenomenon. It can produce diverse and fascinating oscillatory patterns for certain types of neuron models. To address these characteristics, we consider a nonlinear fast-slow FitzHugh-Rinzel (FH-R) model that exhibits elliptic bursting at a fixed set of parameters with a constant input current. The generalization of this classical order model provides a wide range of neuronal responses (regular spiking, fast-spiking, bursting, mixed-mode oscillations, etc.) in understanding the single neuron dynamics. So far, it is not completely understood to what extent the fractional-order dynamics may redesign the firing properties of excitable systems. We investigate how the classical order system changes its complex dynamics and how the bursting changes to different oscillations with stability and bifurcation analysis depending on the fractional exponent (0 < α ≤ 1). This occurs due to the memory trace of the fractional-order dynamics. The firing frequency of the fractional-order FH-R model is less than the classical order model, although the first spike latency exists there. Further, we investigate the responses of coupled FH-R neurons with small coupling strengths that synchronize at specific fractional-orders. The interesting dynamical characteristics suggest various neurocomputational features that can be induced in this fractional-order system which enriches the functional neuronal mechanisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.