Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31672921›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Biological, chemical, and biochemical strategies for modifying glycopeptide antibiotics.

Edward Marschall, Max J Cryle, Julien Tailhades

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shapeshifting bullvalene-linked vancomycin dimers as effective antibiotics against multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Antibiotics and Bacterial Resistance-A Short Story of an Endless Arms Race.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Occurrence ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward MarschallThe Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; EMBL Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Max J CryleThe Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; EMBL Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: max.cryle@monash.edu.
Julien TailhadesThe Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; EMBL Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: julien.tailhades@monash.edu.
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of vancomycin in the 1950s, the glycopeptide antibiotics (GPAs) have been of great interest to the scientific community. These nonribosomally biosynthesized peptides are highly cross-linked, often glycosylated, and inhibit bacterial cell wall assembly by interfering with peptidoglycan synthesis. Interest in glycopeptide antibiotics covers many scientific disciplines, due to their challenging total syntheses, complex biosynthesis pathways, mechanism of action, and high potency. After intense efforts, early enthusiasm has given way to a recognition of the challenges in chemically synthesizing GPAs and of the effort needed to study and modify GPA-producing strains to prepare new GPAs to address the increasing threat of microbial antibiotic resistance. Although the preparation of GPAs, either by modifying the pendant groups such as saccharides or by functionalizing the N- or C-terminal moieties, is readily achievable, the peptide core of these molecules-the GPA aglycone-remains highly challenging to modify. This review aims to present a summary of the results of GPA modification obtained with the three major approaches developed to date:

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsCommunicable DiseasesGlycopeptidesGlycosylationHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological ProductsGlycopeptidesantibioticschemical biologychemical modificationglycopeptide antibioticsglycosylationinfectious diseasenatural product biosynthesisnonribosomal peptidepeptide biosynthesispeptide chemical synthesis

Identifiers

PMID31672921
PMCPMC6901329
OpenAlexW2982711699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.