ArticleGut2020
Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium.
Article in Gut, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 322 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International CAPS Registry: Operated Cases and Cases With Advanced Disease Among High-risk Individuals Participating in a Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance Program; a Case-control Study
Pancreatic Cancer Screening for At-risk Individuals (The Pancreas Scan Study)
Who cites it
322 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Pooled it
- An optimal curriculum for training in endoscopic ultrasound: a summarized evidence-based literature systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies on Pancreatic Cancer Screening.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- Statins and the risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 2,797,186 patients.Cardiology journal · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of pancreatic cancer screening on life expectancy: A systematic review of modeling studies.International journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Focal Pancreatic Parenchymal Atrophy and Delayed Enhancement in Early Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review of Pathologic Basis, Diagnostic Pitfalls, and Evidence Limitations.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Review of Pancreatic Cysts and Malignancy in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Recipients.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Biomarkers for High-Risk Individuals: Insights From the PRECEDE Consortium.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- 3D multi-omics tumour atlases: from technology to biology and clinical translation.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Presumed Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: from bulk detection to single-extracellular vesicle profiling and endoscopic liquid biopsy.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- The benefit of deep genomic testing for asymptomatic high-risk individuals undergoing surveillance for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: European registry for hereditary pancreatic diseases (EUROPAC-PLUS).Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Melanoma and Pancreatic Cancer Phenotype of a PotentialJCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Results of a multigene panel testing approach targeting patients with suspected genetic predisposition to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Progress, challenges, and future directions of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk populations.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Risk-Reducing Interventions in Women With Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
262 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2020
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium met in 2018 to update its consensus recommendations for the management of individuals with increased risk of pancreatic cancer based on family history or germline mutation status (high-risk individuals).
methodsA modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus among a multidisciplinary group of experts who voted on consensus statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed.
resultsConsensus was reached on 55 statements. The main goals of surveillance (to identify high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions and T1N0M0 pancreatic cancer) remained unchanged. Experts agreed that for those with familial risk, surveillance should start no earlier than age 50 or 10 years earlier than the youngest relative with pancreatic cancer, but were split on whether to start at age 50 or 55. Germline
conclusionsPancreatic surveillance is recommended for selected high-risk individuals to detect early pancreatic cancer and its high-grade precursors, but should be performed in a research setting by multidisciplinary teams in centres with appropriate expertise. Until more evidence supporting these recommendations is available, the benefits, risks and costs of surveillance of pancreatic surveillance need additional evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.