Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31672677›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2020

Protein Signatures and Tissue Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Patrick W Underwood, Michael H Gerber, Kathy Nguyen, Daniel Delitto, Song Han, Ryan M Thomas, Christopher E Forsmark, Jose G Trevino, William E Gooding, Steven J Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A protein-based machine learning approach to the identification of inflammatory subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick W UnderwoodDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Michael H GerberDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Kathy NguyenDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Daniel DelittoDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Song HanDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Ryan M ThomasDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; Department of Surgery, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL.
Christopher E ForsmarkDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Jose G TrevinoDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
William E GoodingBiostatistics Facility, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Steven J HughesDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: steven.hughes@surgery.ufl.edu.
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

U-01 CONSORTIUM FOR THE STUDY OF CHRONIC PANCREATITIS,DIABETES AND PANCREATIC CANCER CLINICAL CENTERSU01DK108320 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CUSI, KENNETH, FORSMARK, CHRISTOPHER E · 2015 to 2024
$4.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration fails to diagnose up to 25% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Proteomics can help to overcome this clinical dilemma. We hypothesized that soluble protein signatures can differentiate PDAC from benign tissues. STUDY

designTissues were obtained from resected surgical specimens, lysed, and homogenates collected for analysis with a 41-protein multiplex assay. Analyte concentrations were normalized to total protein. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate for differences in PDAC vs benign tissue.

resultsTissues were obtained from 159 patients, 82 patients with PDAC naïve to therapy and 77 with benign pancreatic pathology. Fourteen analytes had a receiver operating characteristic curve area of >0.75 for predicting PDAC vs benign tissue. A recursive partitioning model using only 2 analytes, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist and transforming growth factor-α, provided an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 91.2%, 90.2%, and 92.2%, respectively. A penalized logistic regression model found 12 analytes that provide diagnostic value to a protein signature. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic after 50 tenfold cross-validations was 0.951. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this model were 91.2%, 87.8%, and 94.8%, respectively. Applying the scenario of 80% disease prevalence in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration for a pancreatic head mass, positive predictive value is 98.5% (95% CI 93.0% to 99.7%) and negative predictive value is 66.0% (95% CI 54.9% to 75.6%).

conclusionsProtein signatures from pancreatic specimens can differentiate PDAC from benign tissue. Additional work to validate these findings in a unique sample set is warranted.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31672677
PMCPMC6986686
OpenAlexW2982678913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.