Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31672295›Full record

ReviewSurgical pathology clinics2019

Pitfalls in Thyroid Cytopathology.

Esther Diana Rossi, Adebowale J Adeniran, William C Faquin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical pathology clinics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Toxic adenoma: to biopsy or not to biopsy?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Article
  20. Contemporary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esther Diana RossiDivision of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Square, 1, Rome 20123, Italy.
Adebowale J AdeniranDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
William C FaquinDepartment of Pathology, WRN 219, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: wfaquin@partners.org.

Funding

Strategies to Overcome Immune Resistance in Head and Neck CancersP01CA240239 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEMPEL, THORSTEN ROMAN · 2019 to 2023
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA240239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is among the first diagnostic tools used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. It has the ability to triage patients with benign and malignant lesions, thus defining the optimum clinical and/or surgical management. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has found worldwide acceptance. Thyroid FNA offers high positive predictive value (97%-99%), with sensitivities and specificities of 65% to 99% and 72% to 100%, respectively. Nonetheless, many potential diagnostic pitfalls exist that can lead to false-positive and/or false-negative results. This article discusses several of the potential pitfalls in the cytologic evaluation of thyroid lesions.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleAdenocarcinoma, FollicularFalse Positive ReactionsGraves DiseaseGuideline AdherenceGuidelines as TopicHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityThyroiditisThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleUltrasonography, DopplerCytologyFalse-negative diagnosesFalse-positive diagnosesFine-needle aspirationThyroid cancerThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID31672295
PMCPMC7404573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.