Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31671991›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Weak neural signatures of spatial selective auditory attention in hearing-impaired listeners.

Lia M Bonacci, Lengshi Dai, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Defining attention from an auditory perspective.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lia M BonacciDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Lengshi DaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Barbara G Shinn-CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Funding

Spatial Hearing in Speech MixturesR01DC015760 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Virginia Ann Best · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
Physiological Signatures and Behavioral Correlates of Hidden Hearing LossR01DC015988 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN, SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Individual differences in supra-threshold sound encodingR01DC013825 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013825NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015760NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial attention may be used to select target speech in one location while suppressing irrelevant speech in another. However, if perceptual resolution of spatial cues is weak, spatially focused attention may work poorly, leading to difficulty communicating in noisy settings. In electroencephalography (EEG), the distribution of alpha (8-14 Hz) power over parietal sensors reflects the spatial focus of attention [Banerjee, Snyder, Molholm, and Foxe (2011). J. Neurosci. 31, 9923-9932; Foxe and Snyder (2011). Front. Psychol. 2, 154.] If spatial attention is degraded, however, alpha may not be modulated across parietal sensors. A previously published behavioral and EEG study found that, compared to normal-hearing (NH) listeners, hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often had higher interaural time difference thresholds, worse performance when asked to report the content of an acoustic stream from a particular location, and weaker attentional modulation of neural responses evoked by sounds in a mixture [Dai, Best, and Shinn-Cunningham (2018). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, E3286]. This study explored whether these same HI listeners also showed weaker alpha lateralization during the previously reported task. In NH listeners, hemispheric parietal alpha power was greater when the ipsilateral location was attended; this lateralization was stronger when competing melodies were separated by a larger spatial difference. In HI listeners, however, alpha was not lateralized across parietal sensors, consistent with a degraded ability to use spatial features to selectively attend.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmAcoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionBrainCuesFemaleFunctional LateralityHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedParietal LobePersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpatial Processing

Identifiers

PMID31671991
PMCPMC7273515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.