Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31671867›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Chest Compressions for Bradycardia during Neonatal Resuscitation-Do We Have Evidence?

Vikash Agrawal, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Praveen Chandrasekharan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Threshold to initiate chest compressions for bradycardia at birth: A narrative review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vikash AgrawalDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. vikashag@buffalo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-7197
Satyan LakshminrusimhaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. slakshmi@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6098-2155
Praveen ChandrasekharanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. pkchandr@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Optimizing Transition with Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping and Supplemental Oxygen during Preterm Resuscitation with Perinatal AsphyxiaR03HD096510 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI CHANDRASEKHARAN, PRAVEEN · 2019 to 2020
$160k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R03HD096510NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD096510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommends the initiation of chest compressions (CC) during neonatal resuscitation after 30 s of effective ventilation if the infant remains bradycardic (defined as a heart rate less than 60 bpm). The CC are performed during bradycardia to optimize organ perfusion, especially to the heart and brain. Among adults and children undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), CC is indicated only for pulselessness or poor perfusion. Neonates have a healthy heart that attempts to preserve coronary and cerebral perfusion during bradycardia secondary to asphyxia. Ventilation of the lungs is the key step during neonatal resuscitation, improving gas exchange and enhancing cerebral and cardiac blood flow by changes in intrathoracic pressure. Compressing the chest 90 times per minute without synchrony with innate cardiac activity during neonatal bradycardia is not based on evidence and could potentially be harmful. Although there are no studies evaluating outcomes in neonates, a recent pediatric study in a hospital setting showed that when CC were initiated during pulseless bradycardia, a third of the patients went into complete arrest, with poor survival at discharge. Ventilation-only protocols such as helping babies breathe are effective in reducing mortality and stillbirths in low-resource settings. In a situation of complete cardiac arrest, CC reinitiates pulmonary flow and supports gas exchange. However, the benefit/harm of performing asynchronous CC during bradycardia as part of neonatal resuscitation remains unknown.

Indexed as

bradycardiachest compressionsneonatal resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID31671867
PMCPMC6915497
OpenAlexW2988410129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.