ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Building a Sustainable Construction Workforce.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in healthy working life expectancy and its difference by workload group among aged over 50 years: a longitudinal perspective.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Characteristics of fall-from-height patients: a retrospective comparison of jumpers and fallers using a multi-institutional registry.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Occupational Injuries Among Construction Workers by Age and Related Economic Loss: Findings From Ohio Workers' Compensation, USA: 2007-2017.Safety and health at work · 2023Article
- Exploring Mentorship in Union and Non-Union Occupational Safety and Health Training Programs.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2023Article
- On-Body Placement of Wearable Safety Promotion Devices Based on Wireless Communication for Construction Workers-on-Foot: State-of-the-Art Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Construction Accidents in Spain: Implications for an Aging Workforce.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Workers' Compensation Claim Rates and Costs for Musculoskeletal Disorders Related to Overexertion Among Construction Workers - Ohio, 2007-2017.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2021Article
- Effect of Occupational Health and Safety Training for Chinese Construction Workers Based on the CHAID Decision Tree.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Biomechanical assessment while using production tables on mast climbing work platforms.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
- Practical Judgment of Workload Based on Physical Activity, Work Conditions, and Worker's Age in Construction Site.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The average U.S. construction worker is aged 42.6 years, and will not be eligible for full Social Security retirement benefits until age 67. Delayed retirement is largely driven by economic need, but construction workers face considerable challenges in remaining on the job. This study explores trade-specific age trends within the construction industry, and the experiences of building trade unions with aging membership. A mixed-methods approach used trade-specific age statistics from the Current Population Survey and key informant interviews with labor leaders, in order to identify union experiences and interventions. Mean and median ages for all subgroups in construction increased from 2003 to 2017. Immigrant construction workers were significantly younger than workers who were born in the U.S. (41 vs. 43,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.