Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31671409›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2019

Revised criteria for diagnosis of NIFTP reveals a better correlation with tumor biological behavior.

Ana Carolina de Jesus Paniza, Thais Biude Mendes, Matheus Duarte Borges Viana, Débora Mota Dias Thomaz, Paula B O Chiappini, Gabriel A Colozza-Gama, Susan Chow Lindsey, Marcos Brasilino de Carvalho, Venâncio Avancini Ferreira Alves, Otavio Curioni and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana Carolina de Jesus PanizaDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thais Biude MendesDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Duarte Borges VianaDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora Mota Dias ThomazDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula B O ChiappiniDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel A Colozza-GamaDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Susan Chow LindseyDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Endocrinology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Brasilino de CarvalhoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Venâncio Avancini Ferreira AlvesDepartment of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Otavio CurioniDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Heliópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
André Uchimura BastosDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Janete Maria CeruttiDivision of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Genetic Bases of Thyroid Tumors Laboratory, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent reclassification of a follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC), subset as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), aims to avoid overtreatment of patients with an indolent lesion. The diagnosis of NIFTP has recently been revisited using more rigid criteria. This study presents histological and molecular findings and a long clinical follow-up of 94 FVPTC, 40 cases of follicular adenoma (FTA) and 22 cases of follicular carcinoma (FTC) that were classified before the advent of the NIFTP reclassification. All slides were reviewed using these rigid criteria and analysis of numerous sections of paraffin blocks and reclassified as 7 NIFTPs, 2 EFVPTCs, 29 infiltrative FVPTC (IFVPTCs), 57 invasive EFVPTC (I-EFVPTCs), 39 FTAs and 22 FTCs. Remarkably, EFVPTC and NIFTP patients were all free of disease at the end of follow-up and showed no BRAF mutation. Only one NIFTP sample harbored mutations, an NRAS Q61R. PAX8/PPARG fusion was found in I-EFVPTCs and FTC. Although additional studies are needed to identify a specific molecular profile to aid in the diagnosis of lesions with borderline morphological characteristics, we confirmed that the BRAF V600E mutation is an important tool to exclude the diagnosis of NIFTP. We also show that rigorous histopathological criteria should be strongly followed to avoid missing lesions in which more aggressive behavior is present, mainly via the analysis of capsule or vascular invasion and the presence of papillary structures.

Indexed as

BRAF V600ENIFTPpapillary thyroid carcinomaPAX8-PPARGRAS

Identifiers

PMID31671409
PMCPMC6893310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.