Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31671123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Typological analysis of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain.

Margot Galière, Marisa Peyre, Facundo Muñoz, Mariline Poupaud, Alain Dehove, François Roger, Isabelle Dieuzy-Labaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margot GalièreWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-9779
Marisa PeyreCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-3418
Facundo MuñozCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-4241
Mariline PoupaudCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5469-0631
Alain DehoveWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.
François RogerCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-6833
Isabelle Dieuzy-LabayeWorld Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are defined as a collaborative approach in which the public and private sector share resources, responsibilities and risks to achieve common objectives and mutual benefits in a sustainable manner. PPPs are identified as a key solution to reinforce Veterinary Services. However only limited information is available on the scope, added value and enabling factors of PPPs in this sector. The aims of this study were to develop a typology of PPPs in the veterinary field and to identify key success factors and obstacles to their implementation. A structured questionnaire was sent to all 181 World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Member Countries and to 47 private contacts. 36 different variables characterizing PPP initiatives were collected. 97 examples of PPPs were retrieved from 76 countries. Dimensionality reduction techniques were combined with clustering and discrimination methods to establish a typology of PPPs and to derive a set of simple rules to classify new instances of PPPs. Three clusters were identified, separated according to two main variables: the type of private partners and the type of interaction. Cluster 1, transactional PPPs, represented the traditional understanding of PPPs by Veterinary Services, initiated and funded by the public sector, giving service delivery accreditation to mostly private veterinarians; cluster 2, collaborative PPPs, included partnerships between producer associations and public Veterinary Services, driven by trade interests; cluster 3, transformational PPPs, represented joint programs initiated and funded by private companies and initially driven by business development objectives. Specific success factors and key obstacles affecting the performances and sustainability of these initiatives were identified for each cluster. This study represents the first practical attempt to develop a meaningful typology of PPPs in the field of animal health and to identify fundamental obstacles currently inhibiting the development of PPPs, and suggests ways to support national Veterinary Services in overcoming these obstacles.

Indexed as

Public-Private Sector PartnershipsVeterinary MedicineIntersectoral Collaboration

Identifiers

PMID31671123
PMCPMC6822735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.