ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Musical Episodic Modulation of Human Functioning: Anticipation Mechanisms, Personal Sense, and Emotional Recall.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
- I Can't Hear You Both at the Same Time: A Temporal Dilemma During Inter-Regional Communication.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Universal and Cross-Cultural Variations in Audio-Motor Synchronization Between French and Indian Participants.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of delay and amplification of auditory feedback for walking: anticipation, variability, and frequency adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Computational modeling of rhythmic expectations: Perspectives, pitfalls, and prospects.PLoS computational biology · 2025Review
- Musical neurodynamics.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
- Perturbation context in paced finger tapping tunes the error-correction mechanism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Duet synchronization interventions affect social interactions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of individual practice on joint musical synchronization.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Impact of sensory modality and tempo in motor timing.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Hebbian learning with elasticity explains how the spontaneous motor tempo affects music performance synchronization.PLoS computational biology · 2023Review
- How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
- Exploring the dynamics of intentional sensorimotor desynchronization using phasing performance in music.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Review
- Collective dynamics support group drumming, reduce variability, and stabilize tempo drift.eLife · 2022Article
- Are We in Time? How Predictive Coding and Dynamical Systems Explain Musical Synchrony.Current directions in psychological science · 2022Article
- Social Interaction and Rate Effects in Models of Musical Synchronization.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A metastable attractor model of self-other integration (MEAMSO) in rhythmic synchronization.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dancing and playing music require people to coordinate actions with auditory rhythms. In laboratory perception-action coordination tasks, people are asked to synchronize taps with a metronome. When synchronizing with a metronome, people tend to anticipate stimulus onsets, tapping slightly before the stimulus. The anticipation tendency increases with longer stimulus periods of up to 3500ms, but is less pronounced in trained individuals like musicians compared to non-musicians. Furthermore, external factors influence the timing of tapping. These factors include the presence of auditory feedback from one's own taps, the presence of a partner performing coordinated joint tapping, and transmission latencies (TLs) between coordinating partners. Phenomena like the anticipation tendency can be explained by delay-coupled systems, which may be inherent to the sensorimotor system during perception-action coordination. Here we tested whether a dynamical systems model based on this hypothesis reproduces observed patterns of human synchronization. We simulated behavior with a model consisting of an oscillator receiving its own delayed activity as input. Three simulation experiments were conducted using previously-published behavioral data from 1) simple tapping, 2) two-person alternating beat-tapping, and 3) two-person alternating rhythm-clapping in the presence of a range of constant auditory TLs. In Experiment 1, our model replicated the larger anticipation observed for longer stimulus intervals and adjusting the amplitude of the delayed feedback reproduced the difference between musicians and non-musicians. In Experiment 2, by connecting two models we replicated the smaller anticipation observed in human joint tapping with bi-directional auditory feedback compared to joint tapping without feedback. In Experiment 3, we varied TLs between two models alternately receiving signals from one another. Results showed reciprocal lags at points of alternation, consistent with behavioral patterns. Overall, our model explains various anticipatory behaviors, and has potential to inform theories of adaptive human synchronization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.