Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31670853›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Washington's privatization of liquor: effects on household alcohol purchases from Initiative 1183.

Sarah Beth L Barnett, Norma B Coe, Jeffrey R Harris, Anirban Basu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah Beth L BarnettAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-911X
Norma B CoePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-0938
Jeffrey R HarrisDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health University of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8728-7195
Anirban BasuNational Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-7402

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MARTINEZ, PRISCILLA · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
GRADUATE RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL PROBLEMST32AA007240 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William C. Kerr · 1985 to 2026
$7.5M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesTL1TR000422 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000422NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NIAAA NIH HHS 5 T32 AA 007240-39NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsWashington Initiative 1183 (I-1183), a 2012 law that privatized liquor retail sales and distribution in Washington State, USA, has had two opposing effects on liquor purchases: it has increased access to liquor and imposed new fees on retailers and distributors. This study aimed to estimate the effect of I-1183 on monthly alcohol purchases during the post-I-1183 period (June 2012-December 2014) compared with the pre-I-1183 period (January 2010-May 2012).

designDIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES STUDY: Setting and participants The study included households participating in the Nielsen Consumer Panel Dataset living in metropolitan and surrounding areas in Washington State and 10 control states. Measurements Outcomes were alcohol purchases by type (ounces of liquor, wine, beer and total alcohol or ethanol). Findings I-1183 was associated with a 6.34-ounce (P < 0.001) and a 2.01-ounce (P < 0.001) increase in monthly liquor and ethanol purchases, respectively, per household in the post-policy period spanning 31 months compared with monthly purchases in control states. In a longitudinal subgroup analysis, low and moderate alcohol purchasers increased monthly purchases of ethanol and high purchasers decreased purchases of ethanol. Conclusions Enacting 'Washington Initiative 1183', a law that privatized sale and distribution of liquor and imposed new fees on retailers and distributors, appears to have been associated with an approximate 82% increase in monthly liquor purchases and 26% increase in monthly ethanol purchases by households in metropolitan and surrounding areas in Washington State, USA.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesCommerceConsumer BehaviorFamily CharacteristicsHumansPrivatizationWashingtonAlcoholalcohol policydifferences-in-differenceshousehold purchasesliquormonopolyprivatizationpublic health policyspirits

Identifiers

PMID31670853
PMCPMC8509083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.