Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31670811›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020

Design of a Repellent Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Using in silico Simulations With AaegOBP1 Protein.

Johan Sebastián Portilla-Pulido, Ruth Mariela Castillo-Morales, Mario Alberto Barón-Rodríguez, Jonny Edward Duque, Stelia Carolina Mendez-Sanchez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-stage insecticide potentials ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johan Sebastián Portilla-PulidoGrupo de Investigación en Bioquímica y Microbiología (GIBIM). Escuela de Química, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga A.A., Colombia.
Ruth Mariela Castillo-MoralesCentro de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales - CINTROP. Facultad de Salud. Escuela de Medicina, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Guatiguará Technology and Research Park, Km 2 Vía El Refugio, Piedecuesta, Santander, Colombia.
Mario Alberto Barón-RodríguezTricoderma Corporation, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Jonny Edward DuqueCentro de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales - CINTROP. Facultad de Salud. Escuela de Medicina, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Guatiguará Technology and Research Park, Km 2 Vía El Refugio, Piedecuesta, Santander, Colombia.
Stelia Carolina Mendez-SanchezGrupo de Investigación en Bioquímica y Microbiología (GIBIM). Escuela de Química, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga A.A., Colombia.
Industrial University of Santander · CO

Funding

Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin irritation has been reported to be the main adverse effect of excessive use of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) and ethyl 3-acetyl(butyl)amino (IR3535) commercial repellents. Therefore, there is an interest in alternatives of natural origin such as essential oils (EOs) and major compounds, which have repellent effects but have no contraindications. The main purpose of the present study was to identify the repellent effect of selected terpenes on Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 (Diptera: Culicidae) by in silico analysis based on their affinity with the odorant protein AaegOBP1. The protein-metabolite interactions in 20 terpenes were analyzed using the SwissDock tool. Terpenes presenting the highest affinity compared with commercial repellents were selected to evaluate repellent activity at concentrations 0.1, 10, and 25% against Ae. aegypti. Different periods (0-2, 2-15, 15-60 min) were evaluated with DEET as a positive control. The toxicity of terpenes was verified through Osiris and Molinspiration Cheminformatics Software, and cytotoxicity assays in Vero and HepaRG cells were performed using the MTT method. Two formulations were prepared with polyethylene glycol to evaluate skin long-lasting in vivo assay. The results showed four terpenes: geranyl acetate, nerolidol, α-bisabolol, and nerol, with affinity to AaegOBP1 comparable with DEET and IR3535. Geranyl acetate, nerolidol, and their mixtures showed no cytotoxicity and protection percentages close to 100% during the test at concentrations 10 and 25%. Long-lasting assays with geranyl acetate and nerolidol formulate showed 3 h as maximum protection time with 100% protection percentage. These metabolites and their mixtures are candidates to repellent formulations with times and protection percentages similar to DEET.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsComputer SimulationDrug DesignFemaleInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsReceptors, OdorantInsect ProteinsInsect Repellentsodorant-binding proteinReceptors, Odorantmolecular dockingodorant-binding proteinprotection timerepellentsecondary metabolite

Identifiers

PMID31670811
PMCPMC7530563
OpenAlexW2986105575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.