Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31670697›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019

A Bayesian Network Analysis of the Diagnostic Process and Its Accuracy to Determine How Clinicians Estimate Cardiac Function in Critically Ill Patients: Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Thomas Kaufmann, José Castela Forte, Bart Hiemstra, Marco A Wiering, Marco Grzegorczyk, Anne H Epema, Iwan C C van der Horst, SICS Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02912624 (Combining Conventional With Advanced Hemodynamic Parameters for Predicting the Outcome of Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02912624 completednot on this map

Combining Conventional With Advanced Hemodynamic Parameters for Predicting the Outcome of Critically Ill Patients: a Pilot for a Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled1,090ConditionsCritical Illness, Acute Disease, Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas Kaufmann *Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-8879
José Castela Forte *Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-0702
Bart HiemstraDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6547-2138
Marco A WieringBernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-7537
Marco GrzegorczykBernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-9270
Anne H EpemaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-6460
Iwan C C van der HorstDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-8522
SICS Study Group
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients is a challenging endeavor, and advanced monitoring techniques are often required to guide treatment choices. Given the technical complexity and occasional unavailability of these techniques, estimation of cardiac function based on clinical examination is valuable for critical care physicians to diagnose circulatory shock. Yet, the lack of knowledge on how to best conduct and teach the clinical examination to estimate cardiac function has reduced its accuracy to almost that of "flipping a coin."

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the decision-making process underlying estimates of cardiac function of patients acutely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) based on current standardized clinical examination using Bayesian methods.

methodsPatient data were collected as part of the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I (SICS-I) prospective cohort study. All adult patients consecutively admitted to the ICU with an expected stay longer than 24 hours were included, for whom clinical examination was conducted and cardiac function was estimated. Using these data, first, the probabilistic dependencies between the examiners' estimates and the set of clinically measured variables upon which these rely were analyzed using a Bayesian network. Second, the accuracy of cardiac function estimates was assessed by comparison to the cardiac index values measured by critical care ultrasonography.

resultsA total of 1075 patients were included, of which 783 patients had validated cardiac index measurements. A Bayesian network analysis identified two clinical variables upon which cardiac function estimate is conditionally dependent, namely, noradrenaline administration and presence of delayed capillary refill time or mottling. When the patient received noradrenaline, the probability of cardiac function being estimated as reasonable or good P(E

conclusionsThe conditional dependencies between clinical variables and the cardiac function estimates resulted in a network consistent with known physiological relations. Conditional probability queries allow for multiple clinical scenarios to be recreated, which provide insight into the possible thought process underlying the examiners' cardiac function estimates. This information can help develop interactive digital training tools for students and physicians and contribute toward the goal of further improving the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination in ICU patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02912624; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02912624.

Indexed as

Bayesian networkcardiac functioncardiologyclinical decision-supportcognitioncritical careeducated guessICUmedical educationphysical examination

Identifiers

PMID31670697
PMCPMC6913745
OpenAlexW2975154347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.