Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31670575›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2019

Predicted Northward Expansion of the Geographic Range of the Tick Vector

Irina Sagurova, Antoinette Ludwig, Nicholas H Ogden, Yann Pelcat, Guillaume Dueymes, Philippe Gachon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The public health threat of emerging phenuiviruses.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irina SagurovaESCER (Étude et Simulation du Climat à l'Échelle Régionale) centre, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Antoinette LudwigPublic Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
Nicholas H OgdenPublic Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
Yann PelcatPublic Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
Guillaume DueymesESCER (Étude et Simulation du Climat à l'Échelle Régionale) centre, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Philippe GachonESCER (Étude et Simulation du Climat à l'Échelle Régionale) centre, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe geographic range of the tick

objectivesWe aimed to estimate minimal temperature conditions for survival of

methodsA simulation model of the tick

resultsThe predicted geographic scope of temperature suitability [ DISCUSSION: Our results raise the possibility of range expansion of

Indexed as

Climate ChangeIxodidaeAnimalsForecastingNorth AmericaTick Infestations

Identifiers

PMID31670575
PMCPMC6867274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.