Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669908›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019

Birmingham mid-head resection periprosthetic fractures: Case report.

Inés Fraile Gamarra, Juan Fernando Jiménez Viseu Pinheiro, Carlos Cano Gala, Juan Francisco Blanco Blanco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inés Fraile GamarraComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 58-182, 37001, Spain. Electronic address: inesfraile@hotmail.com.
Juan Fernando Jiménez Viseu PinheiroComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 58-182, 37001, Spain. Electronic address: juanfer86@gmail.com.
Carlos Cano GalaComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 58-182, 37001, Spain. Electronic address: canhorte@msn.com.
Juan Francisco Blanco BlancoComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 58-182, 37001, Spain. Electronic address: juanfblanco@telefonica.net.
Complejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTotal hip arthroplasty in young patients can cause problems when it comes to choosing a suitable implant. The Birmingham Mid-Head Resection prosthesis (BMHR) offers the option of preserving bone stock despite its poor quality in the femoral neck. Femoral neck fractures are a known complication of hip resurfacing prostheses and the main reason for revision surgery. Retaining the femoral implant may cause difficulties in osteosynthesis carried out with implants habitually used for intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures (e.g., a screw-plate device or a cephalomedullary nail) [2]. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of an 81-year-old patient who underwent surgery for right hip osteoarthritis and received a Birmingham Mid-Head Resection prosthesis. She had no history of previous fractures due to frailty. While on holiday, she sustained a periprosthetic fracture as a result of a fall. While the most common fracture in resurfacing prosthesis is produced in the femoral neck, in this case the patient sustained a subtrochanteric fracture. This fracture was surgically treated by means of open reduction and internal fixation with trochanteric plate and three cerclages. DISCUSSION: Olsen et al. [8] described two fracture patterns: transcervical vertical shear type and subcapital type. In our patient's case, the fracture pattern was different to those described, as the fracture started in the cervical area and reached the subtrochanteric area. This change in the standard periprosthetic fracture pattern leads to a change in the therapeutic attitude that must be adopted.

conclusionBMHR prostheses are metal-on-metal implants that resulted from the development of the standard resurfacing prostheses used to treat hip osteoarthritis in young patients with the goal of preserving as much bone stock as possible. In this paper we will describe a rare complication in this type of prosthesis and how it was surgically treated after reviewing the available literature.

Indexed as

BirminghamCase reportMid-Head resectionPeriprosthetic fractureSubtrochantericTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31669908
PMCPMC6831797
OpenAlexW2979429037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.