Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669580›Full record

Observational studyAppetite2020

Ecological momentary assessment of the snacking environments of children from racially/ethnically diverse households.

Katie A Loth, Allan D Tate, Amanda Trofholz, Jennifer Orlet Fisher, Laura Miller, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Jerica M Berge

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Appetite, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie A LothDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: kloth@umn.edu.
Allan D TateDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Amanda TrofholzDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jennifer Orlet FisherCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Laura MillerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dianne Neumark-SztainerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jerica M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Addressing Unanswered Questions About the Home Environment and Childhood Obesity DisparitiesR01HL126171 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
An exploration of the momentary mechanisms of controlling food-related parenting practices among mothers and fathers of preschool childrenK23HD090324 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LOTH, KATIE ANN · 2017 to 2020
$473k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126171NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD090324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children consume nearly one-third of their daily energy intake as snacks (i.e., eating occasions that occur between meals); thus there is a growing interest in understanding what snacking occasions look like in the homes of young children. This study makes use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to 1) examine differences in the contextual factors, including location, food preparation style, people present, presence of media devices, and overall atmosphere, between meal and snack occasions; and 2) explore differences in the context of snacking occasions across children's gender and weight status. Data for the current study came from the Family Matters Study, which included 150 families with children aged 5-7 years old (n = 25 from each of the following groups: Black/African American, Hispanic, Hmong, Native American, Somali, White). Parents completed an 8-day EMA observation period, during which they were surveyed after each eating occasion with the study child; questions explored contextual factors including location, food preparation style, people present, presence of media devices, and the overall atmosphere of each eating occasion. Differences between meals and snacks were observed; a smaller percentage of snacks (compared to meals) were prepared by the parent, consisted of only homemade food, and were planned ahead of time, as opposed to being served in response to a child's request. Snacks were more likely than other meals to be eaten on the couch and in the presence of a screen. Furthermore, important differences in snacking context were observed by child gender and weight status. Findings illuminate opportunities to improve children's overall dietary intake via interventions focused on improving the quality of foods served during snacks, as well as the contextual environment in which snacks are eaten.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentEthnicityAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsianBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMinnesotaChildrenCross-sectionalDietary intakeEcological momentary assessmentHome environmentNutritionObservational studySnacking

Identifiers

PMID31669580
PMCPMC8996165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.