Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669555›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2019

Optimization, stabilization, and characterization of amphotericin B loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for ocular drug delivery.

Prit Lakhani, Akash Patil, Kai-Wei Wu, Corinne Sweeney, Siddharth Tripathi, Bharathi Avula, Pranjal Taskar, Shabana Khan, Soumyajit Majumdar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prit LakhaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Akash PatilDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Kai-Wei WuDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Corinne SweeneyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Siddharth TripathiNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Bharathi AvulaNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Pranjal TaskarDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.
Shabana KhanNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Soumyajit MajumdarDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA; Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA. Electronic address: majumso@olemiss.edu.
University of Mississippi · US

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30GM122733 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI MAJUMDAR, SOUMYAJIT · 2018 to 2022
$5.3M
Evaluation and Inhibition of Efflux Pumps Expressed on the Blood Ocular BarrierR01EY022120 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI MAJUMDAR, SOUMYAJIT · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022120NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study sought to formulate, optimize, and stabilize amphotericin B (AmB) loaded PEGylated nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) and to study its ocular biodistribution following topical instillation. AmB loaded PEGylated NLC (AmB-PEG-NLC) were fabricated by hot-melt emulsification followed by high-pressure homogenization (HPH) technique. 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)] (mPEG-2K-DSPE) was used for surface PEGylation. mPEG-DSPE with different PEG molecular weight, 1 K, 2 K, 5 K, 10 K, and 20 K, were screened for formulation stability. Furthermore, the AmB loaded PEGylated (2K) NLC (AmB-PEG2K-NLC) was optimized using Box-Behnken design with respect to the amount of AmB, castor oil, mPEG-2K-DSPE, and number of high-pressure homogenization cycles as the factors; particle size, zeta potential, PDI, entrapment efficiency, and loading efficiency as responses. Stability of the optimized AmB-PEG2K-NLC was assessed over 4 weeks, at 4 °C as well as 25 °C and effect of autoclaving was also evaluated. AmB-PEG2K-NLC were tested for their in vitro antifungal activity against Candida albicans (ATCC 90028), AmB resistant Candida albicans (ATCC 200955) and Aspergillus fumigatus (ATCC 204305). Cytotoxicity of AmB-PEG2K-NLC was studied in human retinal pigmented epithelium cells. In vivo ocular biodistribution of AmB was evaluated in rabbits, following topical application of PEGylated NLCs or marketed AmB preparations. PEGylation with mPEG-2K-DSPE prevented leaching of AmB and increased the drug load significantly. The optimized formulation was prepared with a particle size of 218 ± 5 nm; 0.3 ± 0.02 PDI, 4.6 ± 0.1% w/w drug loading, and 92.7 ± 2.5% w/w entrapment efficiency. The optimized colloidal dispersions were stable for over a month, at both 4 °C and 25 °C. AmB-PEG2K-NLCs showed significantly (p < 0.05) better antifungal activity in both wild-type and AmB resistant Candida strains and, was comparable to, or better than, commercially available parenteral AmB formulations like Fungizone™ and AmBisome®. AmB-PEG2K-NLC did not show any toxicity up to a highest concentration of 1% (v/v) (percent formulation in medium). Following topical instillation, AmB was detected in all the ocular tissues tested and statistically significant (p > 0.05) difference was not observed between the formulations tested. An optimized autoclavable and effective AmB-PEG2K-NLC ophthalmic formulation with at least one-month stability, in the reconstituted state, has been developed.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillus fumigatusCandida albicansCell LineChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsExcipientsHumansLipidsMaleNanoparticlesNanostructuresParticle SizeAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug CarriersExcipientsLipidsPolyethylene GlycolsAntifungalDesign of experimentsDrug deliveryIVIVCNanostructured lipid carriersOcular fungal pharmacotherapyPEGylation

Identifiers

PMID31669555
PMCPMC7323935
OpenAlexW2982163613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.