Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669363›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2019

Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.

Kelly Radziwon, Benjamin D Auerbach, Dalian Ding, Xiaopeng Liu, Guang-Di Chen, Richard Salvi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Investigation of the relationship between hyperacusis and auditory processing difficulties in individuals with normal hearing.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tinnitus, sound intolerance, and mental health: the role of long-term occupational noise exposure.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review of the Neurobiological Mechanisms that Distinguish Between Loudness Recruitment and Hyperacusis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly RadziwonCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Benjamin D AuerbachCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Dalian DingCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Xiaopeng LiuCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Guang-Di ChenCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: gchen7@buffalo.edu.
Richard SalviCenter for Hearing and Deafness, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo · USBuffalo State University · US

Funding

Hyperacusis and Central GainR01DC014693 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
The Role of Central Gain Control in Hyperacusis of Diverse OriginF32DC015160 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, BENJAMIN D · 2016 to 2018
$183k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015160NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss generally induces loudness recruitment, but sometimes gives rise to hyperacusis, a debilitating condition in which moderate intensity sounds are perceived abnormally loud. In an attempt to develop an animal model of loudness hyperacusis, we exposed rats to a 16-20 kHz noise at 104 dB SPL for 12 weeks. Behavioral reaction time-intensity functions were used to assess loudness growth functions before, during and 2-months post-exposure. During the exposure, loudness recruitment (R) was present in the region of hearing loss, but subtle evidence of hyperacusis (H) started to emerge at the border of the hearing loss. Unexpectedly, robust evidence of hyperacusis appeared below and near the edge of the hearing loss 2-months post-exposure. To identify the neural correlates of hyperacusis and test the central gain model of hyperacusis, we recorded population neural responses from the cochlea, auditory cortex and lateral amygdala 2-months post-exposure. Compared to controls, the neural output of the cochlea was greatly reduced in the noise group. Consistent with central gain models, the gross neural responses from the auditory cortex and amygdala were proportionately much larger than those from the cochlea. However, despite central amplification, the population responses in the auditory cortex and amygdala were still below the level needed to fully account for hyperacusis and/or recruitment. Having developed procedures that can consistently induce hyperacusis in rats, our results set the stage for future studies that seek to identify the neurobiological events that give rise to hyperacusis and to develop new therapies to treat this debilitating condition.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAmygdalaAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory ThresholdCochleaConditioning, OperantHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHyperacusisMaleNoiseRatsReaction TimeAmygdalaAuditory cortexCentral gainHyperacusisLoudness recruitmentNoise exposure

Identifiers

PMID31669363
PMCPMC6994858
OpenAlexW2982116132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.