Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669324›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2019

Cognitive reappraisal in an unpredictable world: Prior context matters.

Michael J Imburgio, Annmarie MacNamara

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Generalization of reappraisal to novel negative stimuli as evidenced by the LPP.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Event-related potential studies of emotion regulation: A review of recent progress and future directions.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J ImburgioDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: mimburgi@tamu.edu.
Annmarie MacNamaraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Brain-Behavior Markers of Negative Affectivity, Comorbidity in Anxiety DisordersK23MH105553 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MACNAMARA, ANNMARIE EILEEN · 2015 to 2018
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH105553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is a higher order emotion regulation strategy, the effects of which can be measured using the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential that is larger for emotional versus neutral stimuli. Whereas the lab provides a relatively predictable and calm environment in which to engage in reappraisal, outside of the lab, individuals may need to enact reappraisal in unpredictable and anxiety-provoking environments. In prior work, unpredictable auditory tones have been shown to increase threat-processing and induce anxiety. Here, forty-seven participants performed a reappraisal task while being exposed in a blockwise fashion to a "Random Tone" sequence or silence ("No Tone"), to determine the effects of an unpredictable auditory stimulus on the reappraisal of negative pictures. In addition, exploratory analyses assessed whether starting block (i.e., beginning the task in a Random Tone versus No Tone block) would moderate effects. Results showed that during an early time window, reappraisal LPPs were smallest for participants who started in a No Tone block and who performed reappraisal in a No Tone block. Therefore, reappraisal may be optimally performed when conditions are predictable/calm, by participants whose initial learning context was also predictable/calm. In addition, larger LPPs for negative versus neutral images were only observed throughout the later portion of picture presentation for participants who began in a Random Tone block, suggesting that unpredictability may increase sustained attention towards aversive stimuli. The results fit within a growing body of work aimed at understanding contextual and individual differences in emotion regulation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEmotional RegulationEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualThinkingUncertaintyYoung AdultEmotion regulationERPEvent-related potentialLate positive potentialLPPUnpredictability

Identifiers

PMID31669324
PMCPMC6890227
OpenAlexW2981481108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.