Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669251›Full record

ReviewBone2020

Development of protocols for the first serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF SEM) studies of bone tissue.

Patricia Goggin, Elaine M L Ho, Helmut Gnaegi, Stuart Searle, Richard O C Oreffo, Philipp Schneider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The desmosome comes into focus.The Journal of cell biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Modern Microscopic Approaches to Astrocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia GogginBioengineering Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elaine M L HoBioengineering Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Helmut GnaegiDiatome Ltd, Helmstrasse 1, 2560 Nidau, Switzerland.
Stuart SearleGatan UK, Abingdon, OX14 4RY, UK.
Richard O C OreffoBone and Joint Research Group, Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Philipp SchneiderBioengineering Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: p.schneider@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L00609X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council LO21071/Medical Research Council MR/L012626/1Medical Research Council MR/R015651/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an unmet need for a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) technique to simultaneously image osteocytes and the matrix in which these cells reside. In serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF SEM), an ultramicrotome mounted within the vacuum chamber of a microscope repeatedly sections a resin-embedded block of tissue. Backscattered electron scans of the block face provide a stack of high-resolution two-dimensional images, which can be used to visualise and quantify cells and organelles in 3D. High-resolution 3D images of biological tissues from SBF SEM have been exploited considerably to date in the neuroscience field. However, non-brain samples, in particular hard biological tissues, have appeared more challenging to image by SBF SEM due to the difficulties of sectioning and rendering the samples conductive. We have developed and propose protocols for bone tissue preparation using SBF SEM, for imaging simultaneously soft and hard bone tissue components in 3D. We review the state of the art in high-resolution imaging of osteocytes, provide a historical perspective of SBF SEM, and we present first SBF SEM proof-of-concept studies for murine and human tissue. The application of SBF SEM to hard tissues will facilitate qualitative and quantitative 3D studies of tissue microstructure and ultrastructure in bone development, ageing and pathologies such as osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesImaging, Three-DimensionalAnimalsHumansMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningResearch3D imagingBoneHigh resolutionOsteocyteSBF SEMSerial block-face scanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID31669251
PMCPMC6961117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.