ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2020
Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings.
Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient, Examination, and System Factors Associated with Completed Follow-up for Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Breast Findings in a Large, Complex Health Care System.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- Factors Associated With Timeliness and Equity of Access to Outpatient MRI Examinations.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2024Article
- Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.European radiology · 2024Article
- Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Natural Language Processing for Breast Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Comparison of Two Scheduling Models for Prompt Resolution of Diagnostic Imaging Orders.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023Article
- Improving Health Equity in Adherence to Diagnostic Breast Imaging Workup Recommendations.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2022Article
- Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Academic radiology · 2022Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in paediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Screening Mammogram Adherence in Medically Underserved Women: Does Language Preference Matter?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Exacerbation of Inequities in Use of Diagnostic Radiology During the Early Stages of Reopening After COVID-19.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021Article
- Unscheduled Radiologic Examination Orders in the Electronic Health Record: A Novel Resource for Targeting Ambulatory Diagnostic Errors in Radiology.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAssess rate of and factors associated with optimal follow-up in patients with BI-RADS 3 breast findings.
methodsThis Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective cohort study, performed at an academic medical center, included all women undergoing breast imaging (ultrasound and mammography) in 2016. Index reports for unique patients with an assessment of BI-RADS 3 (retrieved via natural language processing) comprised the study population. Patient-specific and provider-related features were extracted from the Research Data Warehouse. The Institutional Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Optimal follow-up rate was calculated as patients with follow-up imaging on the same breast 3 to 9 months from the index examination among patients with BI-RADS 3 assessments. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression determined features associated with optimal follow-up. Malignancy rate and time to malignancy detection were recorded.
resultsAmong 93,685 breast imaging examinations, 64,771 were from unique patients of which 2,967 had BI-RADS 3 findings (4.6%). Excluding patients with off-site index examinations and those with another breast examination <3 months from the index, 1,125 of 1,511 patients (74%) had optimal follow-up. In univariate and multivariable analysis, prior breast cancer was associated with optimal follow-up; younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, divorced status, and lack of insurance were associated with not having optimal follow-up. Malignancy rate was 0.86%, and mean time to detection was 330 days. DISCUSSION: Follow-up of BI-RADS 3 breast imaging findings is optimal in only 74% of women. Further interventions to promote follow-up should target younger, unmarried women, those with Hispanic ethnicity, and women without history of breast cancer and without insurance coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.