Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31669053›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2020

Validation of the Vietnamese Translation Version of the Female Sexual Function Index in Infertile Patients.

Thanh Tam Thi Ho, Minh Tam Le, Quang Vinh Truong, Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen, Ngoc Thanh Cao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Female Sexual Function.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of COVID-19 on Female Sexual Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thanh Tam Thi HoPhD candidate, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Minh Tam LeCenter for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hue University Hospital, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam. Electronic address: leminhtam@huemed-univ.edu.vn.
Quang Vinh TruongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Vu Quoc Huy NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Ngoc Thanh CaoCenter for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Hue University Hospital, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam.
Hue Central Hospital · VNHue University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is regarded as a self-administered screening questionnaire for assessing the presence of any type of sexual dysfunction.

aimThe aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese translation version of the Female Sexual Function Index (VN-FSFI) in a sample of infertile Vietnamese women.

methodsAn existing Vietnamese translated-FSFI version was used as a first-step approach to back-translate into English. Based on the comparison of the original English version and the back-translation script, a modified version of the FSFI was revised. This version was evaluated for "content validity" by a panel of 3 experts and for "face validity" by a pilot study that was based on its results to refine to reach the last Vietnamese FSFI version (VN-FSFI version). A cross-sectional survey to investigate psychometric reliability and validity of the last VN-FSFI version was conducted with 271 infertile Vietnamese women from January 2017 through February 2018, at a hospital located in a central region of Vietnam. Construct validity was evaluated by principal component analysis using varimax rotation and factor analysis. Reliability studies on internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient, domain inter-correlations, and domain-total correlations) and on test-retest (Intraclass correlation coefficient).

main outcome measureConstruct validity and the reliability of the VN-FSFI version.

resultsBased on principal component analysis, a 5-factor model was established, consisting of arousal/orgasm, satisfaction, pain, lubrication, and desire that explained 72.32% of the total variance. The factorial structure supported to 6 retrieved domains that corresponded to the original version. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.92 for the total scale and 0.72-0.89 for the domains. Domain inter-correlations ranged from 0.36-0.73 and domain-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.67-0.84. Test-retest correlation coefficients over 2-4 weeks were 0.97 (P < .001) for the total scale and 0.84-0.96 for the domains.

conclusionWith good psychometric properties, which are almost similar to the original English version, this Vietnamese translation version of the Female Sexual Function Index (VN-FSFI version) was proved to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure multidimensional aspects of sexual function in infertile Vietnamese women. Ho TTT, Le MT, Truong QV, et al. Validation of the Vietnamese Translation Version of the Female Sexual Function Index in Infertile Patients. Sex Med 2019;8:57-64.

Indexed as

Female Sexual Function IndexInfertilityVietnamese Version

Identifiers

PMID31669053
PMCPMC7042161
OpenAlexW2981914394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.