Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31668906›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019

Correlations of pelvis state to foot placement do not imply within-step active control.

Navendu S Patil, Jonathan B Dingwell, Joseph P Cusumano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Foot placement control underlies stable locomotion across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Post-Stroke Adaptation of Lateral Foot Placement Coordination in Variable Environments.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Navendu S PatilDepartment of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Department of Engineering Science & Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: nsp129@psu.edu.
Jonathan B DingwellDepartment of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Joseph P CusumanoDepartment of Engineering Science & Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

Improving Lateral Stepping Control to Reduce Falls in the ElderlyR01AG049735 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DINGWELL, JONATHAN B · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies of human walking have shown that within an individual step, variations in the center of mass (CoM) state can predict corresponding variations in the next foot placement. This has been interpreted by some to indicate the existence of active control in which the nervous system uses the CoM state at or near mid-stance to regulate subsequent foot placement. However, the passive dynamics of the moving body and/or moving limbs also contribute (perhaps strongly) to foot placement, and thus to its variation. The extent to which correlations of CoM state to foot placement reflect the effects of within-step active control, those of passive dynamics, or some combination of both, remains an important and still open question. Here, we used an open-loop-stable 2D walking model to show that this predictive ability cannot by itself be taken as evidence of within-step active control. In our simulations, we too find high correlations between the CoM state and subsequent foot placement, but these correlations are entirely due to passive dynamics as our system has no active control, either within a step or between steps. This demonstrates that any inferences made from such correlations about within-step active control require additional supporting evidence beyond the correlations themselves. Thus, these within-step predictive correlations leave unresolved the relative importance of within-step active control as compared to passive dynamics, meaning that such methods should be used to characterize control in human walking only with caution.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaFootGaitHumansPelvisWalkingCenter of massControlCorrelationsFoot placementGait analysisPassive dynamicsPrediction

Identifiers

PMID31668906
PMCPMC7171510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.