Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31668633›Full record

ArticleKidney international2019

Bioplasmonic paper-based assay for perilipin-2 non-invasively detects renal cancer.

Rong Hu, Rohit Gupta, Zheyu Wang, Congzhou Wang, Hongcheng Sun, Srikanth Singamaneni, Evan D Kharasch, Jeremiah J Morrissey

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urine C-reactive protein content and non-invasive molecular grading of renal cell carcinoma.Kidney cancer journal : official journal of the Kidney Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cancer Diagnosis through SERS and Other Related Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Rohit GuptaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Zheyu WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Congzhou WangNanoscience and Nanoengineering Program, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
Hongcheng SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Srikanth SingamaneniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Evan D KharaschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jeremiah J MorrisseyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: morrisseyjj@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USDuke University · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSouth Dakota School of Mines and Technology · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Center for Kidney Disease ResearchP30DK079333 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMERMAN, MARC RANDALL · 2007 to 2011
$5.1M
URINARY BIOMARKERS OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMASR01CA141521 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISSEY, JEREMIAH J · 2011 to 2019
$2.6M
METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORK AS PROTECTIVE COATING FOR CANCER BIOSPECIMEN PRESERVATIONR21CA236652 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISSEY, JEREMIAH J, SINGAMANENI, SRIKANTH · 2019 to 2021
$705k
POINT OF CARE ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY DETECTION USING MOLECULARLY IMPRINTED GOLD NANOCAGESR21DK100759 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SINGAMANENI, SRIKANTH · 2015 to 2016
$411k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS R01 CA141521NCI NIH HHS R21 CA236652NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079333NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK100759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has poor survival prognosis because it is asymptomatic at an early, more curative stage. Recently, urine perilipin-2 (PLIN-2) was demonstrated to be a sensitive and specific biomarker for the noninvasive, early detection of RCC and an indispensable indicator to distinguish cancer from a benign renal mass. However, current Western blot or ELISA PLIN-2 assays are complicated, expensive, time-consuming or insensitive, making them unsuitable for routine analysis in clinical settings. Here we developed a plasmonic biosensor based on the high refractive index sensitivity of gold nanorattles for the rapid detection of PLIN-2 in patient urine. The paper-based plasmonic assay is highly sensitive and has a dynamic range of 50 pg/ml to 5 μg/ml PLIN-2. The assay is not compromised by variations in urine pH or high concentrations of interfering proteins such as albumin and hemoglobin, making it an excellent candidate for routine clinical applications. The urine PLIN-2 assay readily distinguished patients with pathologically proven clear cell carcinomas of various size, stage and grade (55.9 [39.5, 75.8] ng/ml, median [1st and 3rd quartile]) from age-matched controls (0.3 [0.3, 0.5] ng/ml), patients with bladder cancer (0.5 [0.4, 0.6] ng/ml) and patients with diabetic nephropathy (0.6 [0.4, 0.7] ng/ml). Urine PLIN-2 concentrations were roughly proportional to tumor size (Pearson coefficient 0.59). Thus, this cost-effective and label-free method represents a novel approach to conduct a non-invasive population screen or rapid differential diagnosis of imaged renal masses, significantly facilitating the early detection and diagnosis of RCC.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCarcinoma, Renal CellHumansKidney NeoplasmsPerilipin-2Perilipin-2PLIN2 protein, humanbioplasmonic assaycancer biomarkerscancer diagnosticsrenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID31668633
PMCPMC7467177
OpenAlexW2971359784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.