Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31668623›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Sign and Speech Share Partially Overlapping Conceptual Representations.

Samuel Evans, Cathy J Price, Jörn Diedrichsen, Eva Gutierrez-Sigut, Mairéad MacSweeney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Restricted language access during childhood affects adult brain structure in selective language regions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Heteromodal Word-Meaning Binding Site in the Visual Word Form Area under Top-Down Frontoparietal Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel EvansInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, Alexandra House, 17-19 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, UK. Electronic address: s.evans1@westminster.ac.uk.
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Jörn DiedrichsenBrain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Eva Gutierrez-SigutInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, Alexandra House, 17-19 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre (DCAL), 49 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK.
Mairéad MacSweeneyInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, Alexandra House, 17-19 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre (DCAL), 49 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100229/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conceptual knowledge is fundamental to human cognition. Yet, the extent to which it is influenced by language is unclear. Studies of semantic processing show that similar neural patterns are evoked by the same concepts presented in different modalities (e.g., spoken words and pictures or text) [1-3]. This suggests that conceptual representations are "modality independent." However, an alternative possibility is that the similarity reflects retrieval of common spoken language representations. Indeed, in hearing spoken language users, text and spoken language are co-dependent [4, 5], and pictures are encoded via visual and verbal routes [6]. A parallel approach investigating semantic cognition shows that bilinguals activate similar patterns for the same words in their different languages [7, 8]. This suggests that conceptual representations are "language independent." However, this has only been tested in spoken language bilinguals. If different languages evoke different conceptual representations, this should be most apparent comparing languages that differ greatly in structure. Hearing people with signing deaf parents are bilingual in sign and speech: languages conveyed in different modalities. Here, we test the influence of modality and bilingualism on conceptual representation by comparing semantic representations elicited by spoken British English and British Sign Language in hearing early, sign-speech bilinguals. We show that representations of semantic categories are shared for sign and speech, but not for individual spoken words and signs. This provides evidence for partially shared representations for sign and speech and shows that language acts as a subtle filter through which we understand and interact with the world.

Indexed as

MultilingualismSemanticsSign LanguageSpeechAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbilingualismbrain imagingBSLconceptual representationsfMRIsemanticssign languagespeech

Identifiers

PMID31668623
PMCPMC6839399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.