Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31668478›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2020

Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions: Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications.

Sheri L Johnson, Matthew V Elliott, Charles S Carver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Variable Presence of an Evolutionarily New Brain Structure Is Related to Trait Impulsivity.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Neural Bases of Affect-Based Impulsivity: A Decision Neuroscience Account.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Introducing the Glutamate-Amplifies-Noradrenergic-Effects (GANE) Model to the Neurocognitive Study of Emotion-Related Impulsivity.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Testing a Reward-Processing Model of Negative Urgency in Women With and Without Binge Eating.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emotion-related impulsivity is related to orbitofrontal cortical sulcation.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheri L JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Electronic address: sljohnson@berkeley.edu.
Matthew V ElliottDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Charles S CarverDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.

Funding

Stress-Induced Decays in Working Memory and Internalizing SymptomsR01MH110477 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JOHNSON, SHERI L, TIMPANO, KIARA R · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory about the conceptual basis of psychiatric disorders has long emphasized negative emotionality. More recent ideas emphasize roles for positive emotionality and impulsivity as well. This review examines impulsive responses to positive and negative emotions, which have been labeled as urgency. Urgency is conceptually and empirically distinct from other forms of impulsivity. A large body of work indicates that urgency is more robustly related to psychopathology than are other forms of impulsivity. Researchers have considered 4 neurocognitive models of urgency: excessive emotion generation, poor emotion regulation, risky decision making, and poor cognitive control. Little evidence supports emotion generation or risky decision making as the core issues driving urgency. Rather, urgency appears related to dysfunction in key hubs implicated in the integration of cognitive control and emotion regulation (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula), expressed as response inhibition deficits that emerge most robustly in high arousal contexts. These neurocognitive processes appear remarkably parallel for positive and negative urgency. We provide methodological suggestions and theoretical hypotheses to guide future research.

Indexed as

EmotionsImpulsive BehaviorArousalHumansPrefrontal CortexPsychopathologyCognitionEmotionImagingImpulsivityPsychopathologyUrgency

Identifiers

PMID31668478
PMCPMC7012660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.