Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667911›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2020

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of rumen transfaunation.

Simone Steiner, Nina Linhart, Anita Neidl, Walter Baumgartner, Alexander Tichy, Thomas Wittek

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of rumen transfaunation.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone SteinerDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, The University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-1236
Nina LinhartDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, The University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anita NeidlDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, The University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter BaumgartnerDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, The University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander TichyThe Platform Biostatistics, Department for Biomedical Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas WittekDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, The University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Estonian University of Life ScienceGlasgow University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfaunation is supposed to stimulate normal rumen function and has been used as an ancillary treatment for indigestion. Although it is widely recommended, there are little research data on the efficacy and the necessary volume. The objective of the prospective clinical trial was the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of two different transfaunation volumes which can be obtained under practical conditions. Forty-five cattle suffering from indigestion were included in the study. A scoring system for the classification of rumen fluid was used. Scores were given in accordance with the importance of the parameter as an indication of microbial dysfunction. Animals with disturbed rumen fluid composition and activity were randomly assigned into 3 groups. Group 1 received 1 L of rumen fluid, group 2 received 5 L of rumen fluid and group 3 (control group) received 5 L of body temperature water. Rumen fluid analysis was repeated on days 1 and 4 after transfaunation. The feed intake of the animals was recorded. After the transfaunation of 1 L and 5 L, the rumen fluid score improved significantly from day 0 to days 1 and 4. Rumen fluid samples in the control group showed no significant improvement from day 0 to day 1. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups. But significant differences between the improvement of group 1 and the control group on days 1 and 4 and significant differences between group 2 and the control group on day 1 were detected. Small volumes of rumen fluid are easily obtainable by stomach tubes fitted with suction pumps. In summary, the transfaunation of as little as 1 L of rumen fluid caused significant improvement in the activity of rumen flora in cows suffering from indigestion.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody FluidsCattleCattle DiseasesRumencattleindigestionrumen fluidtransfaunation

Identifiers

PMID31667911
PMCPMC7004065
OpenAlexW2982601655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.