Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667898›Full record

SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2020

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonischemic diabetic ulcers: A systematic review.

Rutger C Lalieu, Robin J Brouwer, Dirk T Ubbink, Rigo Hoencamp, René Bol Raap, Rob A van Hulst

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Negative pressure therapy as complementary treatment in tropical diabetic hand syndrome].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonhealing wounds: Treatment results of a single center.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rutger C LalieuHyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-1451
Robin J BrouwerDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Dirk T UbbinkAcademic Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rigo HoencampDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
René Bol RaapHyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Rob A van HulstAcademic Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLBiomedical Primate Research Centre · NLAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NLMinistry of Defence · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes, which affects 25% of patients and may ultimately lead to amputation of affected limbs. Research suggests hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves healing of these ulcers. However, this has not been reflected in previous reviews, possibly because they did not differentiate between patients with and without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of published literature in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers with outcome measures including complete ulcer healing, amputation rate (major and minor), and mortality. Seven studies were included, of which two were randomized clinical trials. Two studies found no difference in major amputation rate, whereas one large retrospective study found 2% more major amputations in the hyperbaric oxygen group. However, this study did not correct for baseline differences. Two studies showed no significant difference in minor amputation rate. Five studies reporting on complete wound healing showed no significant differences. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not accelerate wound healing and does not prevent major or minor amputations in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Based on the available evidence, routine clinical use of this therapy cannot be recommended. However, the available research for this specific subgroup of patients is scarce, and physicians should counsel patients on expected risks and benefits. Additional research, focusing especially on patient selection criteria, is needed to better identify patients that might profit from this therapy modality.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationWound HealingAmputation, SurgicalDiabetic FootHumansIschemiaPeripheral Arterial DiseaseTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31667898
PMCPMC7079107
OpenAlexW2988264099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.