Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667873›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.

Dooman Arefan, Aly A Mohamed, Wendie A Berg, Margarita L Zuley, Jules H Sumkin, Shandong Wu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dooman ArefanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Aly A MohamedDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Wendie A BergDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Margarita L ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Jules H SumkinDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Shandong WuDepartments of Radiology, Biomedical Informatics, Bioengineering, and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Quantitative assessment of breast MRIs for breast cancer risk predictionR01CA193603 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
Deep interpretation of mammographic images in breast cancer screeningR01CA218405 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) #1R01CA193603National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) #1R01CA218405National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) #3R01CA193603-03S1National Science Foundation ACI-1548562NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193603NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218405NSF ACI-1445606Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Research Scholar #RSCH1530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate two deep learning-based modeling schemes for predicting short-term risk of developing breast cancer using prior normal screening digital mammograms in a case-control setting.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study on a case-control cohort of 226 patients (including 113 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 113 controls) who underwent general population breast cancer screening. For each patient, a prior normal (i.e., with negative or benign findings) digital mammogram examination [including mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and craniocaudal (CC) view two images] was collected. Thus, a total of 452 normal images (226 MLO view images and 226 CC view images) of this case-control cohort were analyzed to predict the outcome, i.e., developing breast cancer (cancer cases) or remaining breast cancer-free (controls) within the follow-up period. We implemented an end-to-end deep learning model and a GoogLeNet-LDA model and compared their effects in several experimental settings using two mammographic view images and inputting two different subregions of the images to the models. The proposed models were also compared to logistic regression modeling of mammographic breast density. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the model performance metric.

resultsThe highest AUC was 0.73 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.68-0.78; GoogLeNet-LDA model on CC view] when using the whole-breast and was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76; GoogLeNet-LDA model on MLO + CC view) when using the dense tissue, respectively, as the model input. The GoogleNet-LDA model significantly (all P < 0.05) outperformed the end-to-end GoogLeNet model in all experiments. CC view was consistently more predictive than MLO view in both deep learning models, regardless of the input subregions. Both models exhibited superior performance than the percent breast density (AUC = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.49-0.59).

conclusionsThe proposed deep learning modeling approach can predict short-term breast cancer risk using normal screening mammogram images. Larger studies are needed to further reveal the promise of deep learning in enhancing imaging-based breast cancer risk assessment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMammographyModels, TheoreticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentbreast cancerbreast densitydeep learningdigital mammographyrisk biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31667873
PMCPMC6980268
OpenAlexW2986544402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.