ArticleMedical physics2020
Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current state of mammography-based artificial intelligence for future breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Development and performance of female breast cancer incidence risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of prediction models for risk of breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2024Pooled it
- Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- AutoCumulus: an automated mammographic density measure created using artificial intelligence.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Breast cancer risk assessment for screening: a hybrid artificial intelligence approach.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep transfer learning for breast cancer detection in underserved regions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Predicting short- to long-term breast cancer risk from longitudinal mammographic screening history.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Breast Cancer Classification with Various Optimized Deep Learning Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of convolutional neural networks and vision transformers in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions.Medicine · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based multimodal medical imaging model for breast cancer screening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated machine learning for early prediction of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in acute pancreatitis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Deep learning prediction of mammographic breast density using screening data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Future of Breast Cancer Organized Screening Program Through Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- CSA-Net: Channel and Spatial Attention-Based Network for Mammogram and Ultrasound Image Classification.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Hybrid ensemble deep learning model for advancing breast cancer detection and classification in clinical applications.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate two deep learning-based modeling schemes for predicting short-term risk of developing breast cancer using prior normal screening digital mammograms in a case-control setting.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study on a case-control cohort of 226 patients (including 113 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 113 controls) who underwent general population breast cancer screening. For each patient, a prior normal (i.e., with negative or benign findings) digital mammogram examination [including mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and craniocaudal (CC) view two images] was collected. Thus, a total of 452 normal images (226 MLO view images and 226 CC view images) of this case-control cohort were analyzed to predict the outcome, i.e., developing breast cancer (cancer cases) or remaining breast cancer-free (controls) within the follow-up period. We implemented an end-to-end deep learning model and a GoogLeNet-LDA model and compared their effects in several experimental settings using two mammographic view images and inputting two different subregions of the images to the models. The proposed models were also compared to logistic regression modeling of mammographic breast density. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the model performance metric.
resultsThe highest AUC was 0.73 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.68-0.78; GoogLeNet-LDA model on CC view] when using the whole-breast and was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76; GoogLeNet-LDA model on MLO + CC view) when using the dense tissue, respectively, as the model input. The GoogleNet-LDA model significantly (all P < 0.05) outperformed the end-to-end GoogLeNet model in all experiments. CC view was consistently more predictive than MLO view in both deep learning models, regardless of the input subregions. Both models exhibited superior performance than the percent breast density (AUC = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.49-0.59).
conclusionsThe proposed deep learning modeling approach can predict short-term breast cancer risk using normal screening mammogram images. Larger studies are needed to further reveal the promise of deep learning in enhancing imaging-based breast cancer risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.