Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2019
Sterile carbon particle suspension vs India ink for endoscopic tattooing of colonic lesions: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03637933 (Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Tattooing in Colorectal Surgery. India Ink vs Sterile Carbon Particle Suspension. Randomized Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Tattooing in Colorectal Surgery. India Ink vs Sterile Carbon Particle Suspension. Randomized Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel polymer platform for endoscopic tattooing with high efficacy and safety.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Laser Removal of Buccal Skin Coloration Caused by India Ink Injection for Cancer Marking.Eplasty · 2022Article
- Intraoperative Tumor Localization of Early Gastric Cancers.Journal of gastric cancer · 2021Review
- What is the role of submucosal tattoos in device assisted enteroscopy?Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Article
- Response to: What is the role of submucosal tattoos in device assisted enteroscopy?Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent markers have been used preoperatively to mark colonic lesions, especially India ink. In recent years, another kind of marker has been developed: sterile carbon particle suspension (SCPS). No comparison between these two markers has yet been made. The aim of the present study was to compare the pyrogenic, inflammatory and intraperitoneal effect of these two markers.
methodsFrom September 2015 to December 2018, adult patients who were candidates for elective laparoscopic colon resection were randomized to the SCPS or conventional India ink injection group using computer-based randomization. The primary endpoint of the study was the presence of intraoperative adhesions related to the endoscopic tattoo. Secondary endpoints were differences in white blood cell, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels as well as, abdominal pain and body temperature at baseline (before endoscopic tattooing) and 6 and 24 h after colonoscopy. Finally, the visibility of the tattoo during the minimally invasive intervention was assessed.
resultsNinety-four patients were included in the study, 47 for each arm. There were 45/94 females (47.9%) and 49/94 males (52.1%), with a median age of 67.85 ± 9.22 years. No differences were found between groups in WBC, fibrinogen levels, body temperature or VAS scores, but we documented significantly higher CRP values at 6 and 24 h after endoscopic tattooing with India ink injection. There were significantly fewer adhesions in the SCPS Endoscopic Marker group. All the endoscopic tattoos were clearly visible.
conclusionsSCPS is an effective method for tattooing colonic lesions and has a better safety profile than traditional India ink in terms of post-procedure inflammatory response and intraoperative bowel adhesions. CLINICAL
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT03637933).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.