ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Hybrid PET- and MR-driven attenuation correction for enhanced
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-Body Dynamic Positron Emission and Computed Tomography (WBD-PET/CT): Latest Developments, Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long Axial Field of View PET: A New Era of Quantitative PET Imaging for Prospective Applications Beyond Classical Theranostics.PET clinics · 2025Review
- Quantification of FDG in the spinal cord using PET/MRI.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- PET/MR imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Effects of dynamic [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque: Is There a Molecular Signature?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Assessment of different quantification metrics of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Reproducibility of Standardized Uptake Values Including Volume Metrics Between TOF-PET-MR and TOF-PET-CT.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Iterative reconstruction incorporating background correction improves quantification of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Assessing the qualitative and quantitative impacts of simple two-class vs multiple tissue-class MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac PET/MR.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Cardiac PET/MR: Are sophisticated attenuation correction techniques necessary for clinical routine assessments?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Clinical perspectives for the use of total body PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Article
- PET-derived bone information from 18F-sodium fluoride: A perfect match for whole-body PET/MR attenuation correction?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard MR Dixon-based attenuation correction (AC) method in positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging segments only the air, lung, fat and soft-tissues (4-class), thus neglecting the highly attenuating bone tissues and affecting quantification in bones and adjacent vessels. We sought to address this limitation by utilizing the distinctively high bone uptake rate constant K
methodsWe introduce 5-class K
resultsIn rabbits, we observed similar (< 1.2% mean difference) vertebral bone
conclusionsK
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.