ArticlePsychological research2021
Endogenous control of task-order preparation in variable dual tasks.
Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Advancing an account of hierarchical dual-task control: A focused review on abstract higher-level task representations in dual-task situations.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Review
- Investigating differential practice effects on cued task-order coordination and coordination adjustment in dual tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Sequential adjustments of task-pair control in dual-task contexts: Examining the role of repetition priming effects at the level of task-pair sets and abstract control states.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- Practice effects on dual-task order coordination and its sequential adjustment.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- A mechanism underlying improved dual-task performance after practice: Reviewing evidence for the memory hypothesis.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?Psychological research · 2024Article
- Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Trial-to-trial modulation of task-order switch costs survive long inter-trial intervals.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Inter-Individual Differences in Executive Functions Predict Multitasking Performance - Implications for the Central Attentional Bottleneck.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual-task performance typically leads to performance impairments in comparison to single tasks (i.e., dual-task costs). The literature discusses the contribution to these dual-task costs due to (1) bottleneck limitations in the dual-component tasks and (2) executive control processes regulating access to this bottleneck. Previous studies investigated the characteristics of executive control processes primarily triggered by external stimulus information. In the present study, however, we investigated the existence as well as the characteristics of internally triggered and driven endogenous control processes to regulate bottleneck access. In detail, we presented dual-task blocks with varying task orders and informed participants in advance about repetitions of the same task order as well as switches between different task orders (i.e., task-order repetitions and switches were predictable). Experiment 1 demonstrated that task-order information and an increased preparation time generally increase the efficiency for endogenous task-order control and improves preparation for task-order switches. This finding is basically consistent with the assumption of the existence of endogenous control processes. Experiment 2, however, did not provide evidence that this endogenous control is related with working-memory maintenance mechanisms. Experiment 3 showed that endogenous control does not only fully complete task-order preparation but also requires exogenous, stimulus-driven components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31667597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.