Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667573›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Ze-Tian Shen, Han Zhou, Ao-Mei Li, Xiao-Qin Ji, Chang-Chen Jiang, Xi Yuan, Bing Li, Xi-Xu Zhu, Gui-Chun Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ze-Tian ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Han ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Ao-Mei LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao-Qin JiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Chang-Chen JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Xi YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Bing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Xi-Xu ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. simon_doctor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-8819
Gui-Chun HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. huangguichun@nju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, toxicity, and prognostic factors of SBRT combined with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

methodsA total of 56 patients with LAPC treated with SBRT combined with GEM-CAP were reviewed from October 2010 to October 2016. The median total prescription dose at five fractions was 40 Gy (30-50 Gy). The patients were subjected to two cycles of GEM-CAP before SBRT. GEM-CAP chemotherapy was then offered for four cycles or until disease tolerance or progression. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsThe median OS and PFS from the date of diagnosis was 19 (95% CI 14.6-23.4) and 12 months (95% CI 8.34-15.66), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 82.1% and 35.7%, whereas the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 48.2% and 14.3%, respectively. The median carbohydrate antigen 19-9-determined PFS time was 11 months (95% CI 5.77-16.24). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, pre-treatment CA19-9 level, and post-treatment CA19-9 decline were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). Acute toxicity was minimal, with two cases (3.6%) experiencing grade 3 duodenal obstruction. No adverse events greater than grade 3 occurred. In late toxicity, three patients (5.4%) developed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and two (3.6%) suffered from perforation caused by grade 4 radiation enteritis and intestinal fistula.

conclusionsThe combination of Cyberknife SBRT and GEM-CAP achieved excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity for LAPC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineChemoradiotherapyDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRadiosurgeryCapecitabineDeoxycytidineGemcitabineCyberKnifeLocally advanced pancreatic cancerPrognostic factorsStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID31667573
PMCPMC11804411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.