Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667491›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Cellular and Widefield Imaging of Sound Frequency Organization in Primary and Higher Order Fields of the Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Sandra Romero, Ariel E Hight, Kameron K Clayton, Jennifer Resnik, Ross S Williamson, Kenneth E Hancock, Daniel B Polley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cortical Representation of Pitch Perception in Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra RomeroEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ariel E HightEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Kameron K ClaytonEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Jennifer ResnikEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ross S WilliamsonEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Kenneth E HancockEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Daniel B PolleyEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

Activity-Dependent Influences on Auditory CircuitsR01DC009836 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POLLEY, DANIEL B. · 2009 to 2024
$6.7M
In Vivo Dissection of Auditory Corticofugal CircuitsF32DC015376 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI WILLIAMSON, ROSS STEWART · 2016 to 2018
$181k
Optogenetic Stimulation in a Model of the Auditory Brainstem ImplantF31DC014871 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HIGHT, ARIEL EDWARD · 2015 to 2016
$67k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC014871NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015376NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse auditory cortex (ACtx) contains two core fields-primary auditory cortex (A1) and anterior auditory field (AAF)-arranged in a mirror reversal tonotopic gradient. The best frequency (BF) organization and naming scheme for additional higher order fields remain a matter of debate, as does the correspondence between smoothly varying global tonotopy and heterogeneity in local cellular tuning. Here, we performed chronic widefield and two-photon calcium imaging from the ACtx of awake Thy1-GCaMP6s reporter mice. Data-driven parcellation of widefield maps identified five fields, including a previously unidentified area at the ventral posterior extreme of the ACtx (VPAF) and a tonotopically organized suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF) that extended laterally as far as ectorhinal cortex. Widefield maps were stable over time, where single pixel BFs fluctuated by less than 0.5 octaves throughout a 1-month imaging period. After accounting for neuropil signal and frequency tuning strength, BF organization in neighboring layer 2/3 neurons was intermediate to the heterogeneous salt and pepper organization and the highly precise local organization that have each been described in prior studies. Multiscale imaging data suggest there is no ultrasonic field or secondary auditory cortex in the mouse. Instead, VPAF and a dorsal posterior (DP) field emerged as the strongest candidates for higher order auditory areas.

Indexed as

SoundAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysBrainBrain MappingFemaleMaleMiceNeuronscalcium imagingmapmesoscaletonotopytwo-photon

Identifiers

PMID31667491
PMCPMC7132909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.