Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667368›Full record

ArticleSynthetic and systems biotechnology2019

Benchmarking two

Monica I Espinosa, Thomas C Williams, Isak S Pretorius, Ian T Paulsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Infections ofViruses · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Evolutionary engineering ofScience advances · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica I EspinosaARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
Thomas C WilliamsARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
Isak S PretoriusARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
Ian T PaulsenARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-carbon compounds, such as methanol, are becoming potential alternatives to sugars as feedstocks for the biological production of chemicals, fuels, foods, and pharmaceuticals. Efficient biological production often requires extensive genetic manipulation of a microbial host strain, making well-characterised and genetically-tractable model organisms like the yeast

Indexed as

Metabolic engineeringMethanolMethylotrophyMIG3Synthetic biologyYeast

Identifiers

PMID31667368
PMCPMC6807065
OpenAlexW2981028060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.